Florian Weimer wrote:
Some packages (notably compilers) avoid cyclic build dependencies by
shipping some sort of pre-compiled blob in the source package. This
blob is then used to compile the package.
Does this fullfil the requirement that packages in main must be built
from source code?
Le jeudi 31 juillet 2008 à 10:07 +0200, Jens Peter Secher a écrit :
What do you mean by reliability here? From a package-building
perspective, I find it to be more reliable to use the precompiled blop
because then I can make sure that the package compiles in a minimal
environment. Otherwise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some packages (notably compilers) avoid cyclic build dependencies by
shipping some sort of pre-compiled blob in the source package. This
blob is then used to compile the package.
Does this fullfil the requirement that packages in main must be built
from source
* Florian Weimer:
Some packages (notably compilers) avoid cyclic build dependencies by
shipping some sort of pre-compiled blob in the source package. This
blob is then used to compile the package.
Does this fullfil the requirement that packages in main must be built
from source code?
Is
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Florian Weimer:
Some packages (notably compilers) avoid cyclic build dependencies by
shipping some sort of pre-compiled blob in the source package. This
blob is then used to compile the package.
Does this fullfil the requirement that
Some packages (notably compilers) avoid cyclic build dependencies by
shipping some sort of pre-compiled blob in the source package. This
blob is then used to compile the package.
Does this fullfil the requirement that packages in main must be built
from source code?
The alternative would be a
6 matches
Mail list logo