On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:07:23 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:
> The Social Contract states that everything in
> Debian must be free, with the DFSG being the guidelines to determine
> whether a work is free. This has been discussed at extreme length,
> culminating in SC2004-003, which affirmed that ever
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I would retain them as a courtesy to upstream; users are
> no more and no less free to modify or remove them than Debian is.
> The alternative -- to demand that all content other than license
> texts and other legal indicia must be arb
On Sat, 2005-18-06 at 09:26 +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> The Social Contract needs to be changed then, if it leads to such
> a silliness.
http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
~Evan
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Debian Project (http://www.debian.org/)
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 09:26:00AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> (Please respect MFT)
I do. The message I replied to did not have an MFT header.
> The Social Contract needs to be changed then, if it leads to such
> a silliness.
Then feel free to propose a General Resolution to change it. Howev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The Social Contract needs to be changed then, if it leads to such
>a silliness.
Yes. This is why we had months-long flames and we will continue to have
them in the future.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
(Please respect MFT)
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:13:39PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > They are out of the scope of the DFSG. They are neither programs nor
> > documentation: they are speeches and articles which are logically
> > non modifiable without the consent of their author.
>
> Sorry, y
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> They are out of the scope of the DFSG. They are neither programs nor
>> documentation: they are speeches and articles which are logically
>> non modifiable without the consent of their author.
>>
>> Whether they are around or not is irrelevant t
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:13:39PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> They are out of the scope of the DFSG. They are neither programs nor
> documentation: they are speeches and articles which are logically
> non modifiable without the consent of their author.
Sorry, you're wrong. The Social Contract
On 6/17/05, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> etc/{CENSORSHIP,copying.paper,INTERVIEW,LINUX-GNU,THE-GNU-PROJECT,WHY-FREE}
> >
> > only "copying.paper" sounds like a license; the rest are simply documents,
> > which must be DFSG-free to be i
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> etc/{CENSORSHIP,copying.paper,INTERVIEW,LINUX-GNU,THE-GNU-PROJECT,WHY-FREE}
>
> only "copying.paper" sounds like a license; the rest are simply documents,
> which must be DFSG-free to be in Debian. This is not a matter of
> controversy, or even signifi
10 matches
Mail list logo
