Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme (was: Anti-TPM clauses)

2007-09-13 Thread Freek Dijkstra
Francesco Poli wrote: Well, I made a detailed analysis of the issues I see in CC-by(-sa)-v3.0 licenses. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00124.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/03/msg00105.html Just saying that they are in spirit the same as GPL is *not* a

Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme (was: Anti-TPM clauses)

2007-09-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:06:12 +0200 Freek Dijkstra wrote: [...] Francesco, [one constructive answer to one of my concerns, at last!] So it seems to me that CC does not make any more limitations or restrictions then those that are already there in the law (e.g. the restriction you can only

Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme (was: Anti-TPM clauses)

2007-09-13 Thread Matthew Johnson
Francesco Poli wrote: On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:06:12 +0200 Freek Dijkstra wrote: So it seems to me that CC does not make any more limitations or restrictions then those that are already there in the law (e.g. the restriction you can only buy blank CDs and DVDs if you pay a fee). So this