Le ven 29/08/2003 à 22:01, Mathieu Roy a écrit :
> The DFSG is free enough to be useful -- you still cannot just simply
> modify it and redistribute it under the same name, do you?
So what?
The LPPL has the same restriction and is considered free by Debian, GNU
and OSI.
--
.''`. Jossel
On 2003-08-29 21:01:40 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May I for instance take a copy of Debian and redistribute it by
_only_
changing the DFSG text, adding a line saying that the GFDL qualified
documentation as free documentation?
Probably (modulo any trademark guff), but if you
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:01:40PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> The DFSG is free enough to be useful -- you still cannot just simply
> modify it and redistribute it under the same name, do you? Or is that
> exactly what mean "build on"? Am I able to publish a DFSG named DFSG
> (if it's just because
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>
> > > Yes, and our goal is to always respect authors: by not distributing
> > > works that they don't wish to make available under the terms of the
> > > DFSG.
>
> > Including the GPL
4 matches
Mail list logo
