On 5/2/19 7:51 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Moshe Piekarski writes ("Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay
> package"):
>> The copyright holder made a statement on Facebook chat that he considers
>> the code to be in the public domain. Is th
Moshe Piekarski writes ("Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay
package"):
> The copyright holder made a statement on Facebook chat that he considers
> the code to be in the public domain. Is that enough for me to consider
> it such?
While legally in
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 12:40 PM Moshe Piekarski wrote:
> The copyright holder made a statement on Facebook chat that he considers
> the code to be in the public domain. Is that enough for me to consider
> it such?
Unfortunately dedicating code to the public domain is not feasible
world-wide so
The copyright holder made a statement on Facebook chat that he considers
the code to be in the public domain. Is that enough for me to consider
it such?
Sincerely,
Moshe Piekarski
--
There's no such thing as a stupid question,
But there are plenty of inquisitive idiots.
signature.asc
On 4/10/19 9:39 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Before that, it would be better to start a discussion with the copyright
> holder(s) to get a more robust grant under free software conditions.
Unfortunately the copyright holder hasn't answered any of my emails to
the provided address, and I haven't been
Moshe Piekarski writes:
> On 4/10/19 7:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > * If the formulation “please do foo” is an enforcible *condition* on the
> > grant, then there are several such enforcible conditions that make
> > this work non-free:
> Given that the wordplay package may not meet the DFSG,
On 4/10/19 7:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> * If the formulation “please do foo” is an enforcible *condition* on the
> grant, then there are several such enforcible conditions that make
> this work non-free:
Given that the wordplay package may not meet the DFSG, do I have to
remove it?
Sincerely,
Ben Finney writes:
> =
> --
>
> Wordplay Version 7.22 Evans A Criswell 03-20-96
>
> --
>
> This program was written for fun and is
debian.mailingli...@melachim.net writes:
> What is the work we are discussing? Can we see the full source online
> somewhere (to see its entire license grant)?
(That was written by me in a previous message, but it's appearing in the
material you wrote. I think something is failing in your
9 matches
Mail list logo
