On Thu, 22 May 2008 09:55:49 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
> All digitally-stored, computer-accessible information is software, as
> distinct from the hardware that contains it.
I definitely agree.
I even wrote an essay on the meaning of the term "software":
http://frx.netsons.org/essays/softfrdm/whati
Le mercredi 21 mai 2008 à 16:12 -0700, Yuhong Bao a écrit :
> DFSG is not suitable for, and should not be applied to, things other than
> software.
I see dead horses. People beat them. They don’t know they are dead. They
only see what they want to see.
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. L
"Yuhong Bao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DFSG is not suitable for, and should not be applied to, things other
> than software.
Agreed. It's called the "Debian Free Software Guidelines" and is only
intended for software. This includes anything distributed as part of
Debian.
> For docs there sho
DFSG is not suitable for, and should not be applied to, things other than
software. For docs there should be a separate DFDG, and even GNU don't care
about free art and trademarks. Solving this problem would also help solve
the GFDL "non-free" doc problem that caused some GFDL docs to go into
n
4 matches
Mail list logo