Documenting License Interpretations (was: Re: GPL for documentation ?)

2005-03-11 Thread David Schmitt
On Thursday 10 March 2005 23:37, Gervase Markham wrote: Don Armstrong wrote: If there really is a source for confusion, then make an addendum to the license file explaining how the author views the GPL applying to the work. I seem to remember a very recent thread on d-l saying that this

Re: Documenting License Interpretations (was: Re: GPL for documentation ?)

2005-03-11 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:05:32AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: On Thursday 10 March 2005 23:37, Gervase Markham wrote: Don Armstrong wrote: If there really is a source for confusion, then make an addendum to the license file explaining how the author views the GPL applying to the work.

Documenting License Interpretations (was: Re: GPL for documentation ?)

2005-03-10 Thread David Schmitt
On Thursday 10 March 2005 23:37, Gervase Markham wrote: Don Armstrong wrote: If there really is a source for confusion, then make an addendum to the license file explaining how the author views the GPL applying to the work. I seem to remember a very recent thread on d-l saying that this