Not quite contradicting what was written, but it isn't quite so simple...
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trademarks are a no-op. The DFSG allows for name-change clauses (DFSG 4).
This allows us to modify and redistribute without infringing trademarks
if need be. No freedom issue here.
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:19, MJ Ray took the opportunity to say:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:15, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to
say:
I sent a clarification request using their feedback form a couple of
weeks ago. Still no reaction
On Friday 25 August 2006 01:57, Stephen Gran took the opportunity to say:
So, if the domain keys patent is under active enforcement, this software
probably should not be approved by the ftp masters. If it is not under
active enforcement, and is under a free license, there is no reason not
to
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
By the way, are there still a few countries not in the Berne Union? Maybe
copyright isn't completely cross-jurisdiction, but it seems near enough.
The only real country left is Taiwan, and it's mostly because the rebels
in the mainland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about it: Since there is no object code in the
libmail-domainkeys-perl or libmail-dkim-perl binary packages, there shouldn't
be any problems with GPL as far as *these* packages are concerned.
Did you notice my answer? I already explained the issue.
--
Adam Borowski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
By the way, are there still a few countries not in the Berne Union? Maybe
copyright isn't completely cross-jurisdiction, but it seems near enough.
The only real country left is Taiwan, and it's mostly because the
On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:15, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to say:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:43, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to
write:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
What about the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since DFSG apparently (according to the recent discussion) only deals with
copyright and restrictions imposed by the copyright owner, I assume that
uploading the independently developed Perl packages, libmail-domainkeys-perl
and libmail-dkim-perl, should be possible.
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since DFSG apparently (according to the recent discussion) only
deals with copyright and restrictions imposed by the copyright owner
It's quite apparent from reading the DFSG that there's no such
limitation. The DFSG in particular are concerned with
This one time, at band camp, Ben Finney said:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since DFSG apparently (according to the recent discussion) only
deals with copyright and restrictions imposed by the copyright owner
It's quite apparent from reading the DFSG that there's no such
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:43, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to write:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ib yte.se...
What about the statement on
On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yte.se...
What about the statement on http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys?
Yahoo!'s DomainKeys Intellectual Property may be
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yte.se...
What about the statement on
13 matches
Mail list logo
