On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:00:48 + Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message 20091216233823.af491478@firenze.linux.it, Francesco
Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes
The second question may seem strange, but why copyleft license is
used?
Hopefully in order to prevent the distribution of
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:00:48 + Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
If it's copyright, it's proprietary.
proprietary == property. If it's copyright, it has an owner,
therefore it's property, therefore it's proprietary.
Your reasoning does not
On 12/18/09, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
I'm doubtful that it's correct to say “If it's copyright, it has an
owner”. Copyright is *not* a property right; it's a different monopoly
right. Monopolies are held; that doesn't make the holder of a monopoly
the “owner” in a property
Andrew Donnellan ajdli...@gmail.com writes:
On 12/18/09, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
I'm doubtful that it's correct to say “If it's copyright, it has an
owner”. Copyright is *not* a property right; it's a different
monopoly right. Monopolies are held; that doesn't make the
On 12/18/09, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Andrew Donnellan ajdli...@gmail.com writes:
On 12/18/09, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
I'm doubtful that it's correct to say “If it's copyright, it has an
owner”. Copyright is *not* a property right; it's a different
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:20:45 +0200 anatoly techtonik wrote:
Hello,
Hello...
Following recent Python policy updates I wonder if GPL is really the
license of choice for software documentation in Debian?
IMHO, yes it is and it should be, really!
The GPL is the best choice, whenever a
In message 20091216233823.af491478@firenze.linux.it, Francesco
Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes
The second question may seem strange, but why copyleft license is
used?
Hopefully in order to prevent the distribution of proprietary
derivative works...
CLOSED derivative works.
If it's
On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:00 AM, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
CLOSED derivative works.
If it's copyright, it's proprietary.
proprietary == property. If it's copyright, it has an owner, therefore
it's property, therefore it's proprietary.
Although the GNU project disagrees again with your
license is used?
Does it allow to cite Debian Policy in books without making those
books freely available?
Please, CC.
Original thread:
http://old.nabble.com/Final-updates-for-this-Python-Policy-revision-to26754791.html
--
anatoly t.
-- Forwarded message --
From: anatoly techtonik
9 matches
Mail list logo
