Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
Nobody will think that General Motors has endorsed this package or
this OS because there's a picture of a Humvee in there.
The Hummer might actually be a problem if its shape is a registered
design (called design patent in the US). Even if
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:23:00AM +0100, Claus F?rber wrote:
Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
Nobody will think that General Motors has endorsed this package or
this OS because there's a picture of a Humvee in there.
The Hummer might actually be a problem if its shape
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:53:32 -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:10:26PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
You've got the Freemason logo in there feature for feature!
That's not original clip art.
Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
Nobody will think that General Motors has endorsed this package or
this OS because there's a picture of a Humvee in there.
The Hummer might actually be a problem if its shape is a registered
design (called design patent in the US). Even if
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:23:00AM +0100, Claus F?rber wrote:
Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
Nobody will think that General Motors has endorsed this package or
this OS because there's a picture of a Humvee in there.
The Hummer might actually be a problem if its shape
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell, Namco, and Hummer.
I don't think it's right to distribute other people's
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:57:46AM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell,
William Ballard writes:
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell, Namco, and Hummer.
I don't think it's
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:57:46AM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:57:46AM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell, Namco,
Why not include the McDonald's logo or a picture of a McDonald's
hamburger? I'd like to include that on my website.
How are these different?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:16:24AM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
Why not include the McDonald's logo or a picture of a McDonald's
hamburger? I'd like to include that on my website.
How are these different?
Context is everything.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not include the McDonald's logo or a picture of a McDonald's
hamburger? I'd like to include that on my website.
How are these different?
They're not. Look! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1312774.stm
There's one now. It's perfectly
William Ballard writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:44:13AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
He might violate their trademarks -- say by proclaiming that he is
selling Humvees when actually selling Pintos. But that's got nothing
to do with Debian, and he'd be doing so whether or not this
William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:10:26PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
clearly what it is. Duracell has no right in law to stop others from
depicting black oblongs with copper ends. They *do* have a right to
I dare you to package the golden arches
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell, Namco, and Hummer.
I don't think it's right to distribute other people's
William Ballard writes:
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell, Namco, and Hummer.
I don't think it's
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:57:46AM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:57:46AM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
Regarding
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00312.html
I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their Trademarked
logo and diluting their trademark.
I'm also going to write letters to Duracell, Namco,
Why not include the McDonald's logo or a picture of a McDonald's
hamburger? I'd like to include that on my website.
How are these different?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:16:24AM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
Why not include the McDonald's logo or a picture of a McDonald's
hamburger? I'd like to include that on my website.
How are these different?
Context is everything.
- David Nusinow
William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not include the McDonald's logo or a picture of a McDonald's
hamburger? I'd like to include that on my website.
How are these different?
They're not. Look! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1312774.stm
There's one now. It's perfectly
William Ballard writes:
Why not include the McDonald's logo or a picture of a McDonald's
hamburger? I'd like to include that on my website.
How are these different?
Without knowing context and intent, we cannot answer; since you have
not related that to Debian, I do not wish to go into
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:44:13AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
He might violate their trademarks -- say by proclaiming that he is
selling Humvees when actually selling Pintos. But that's got nothing
to do with Debian, and he'd be doing so whether or not this clip art
were nearby.
Kind
William Ballard writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:44:13AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
He might violate their trademarks -- say by proclaiming that he is
selling Humvees when actually selling Pintos. But that's got nothing
to do with Debian, and he'd be doing so whether or not this
William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:44:13AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
He might violate their trademarks -- say by proclaiming that he is
selling Humvees when actually selling Pintos. But that's got nothing
to do with Debian, and he'd be doing so
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:36:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
Removal of the pacman image is the
only one that I can see any case for at all
Even if this were once true (which I doubt), there's no chance that
anybody still has a valid trademark on pacman; it's diluted to the
point of being
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:10:26PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
clearly what it is. Duracell has no right in law to stop others from
depicting black oblongs with copper ends. They *do* have a right to
I dare you to package the golden arches as clipart.
Or Mr. Peanut.
You've got the
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:38:34PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
I dare you to package the golden arches as clipart.
Or Mr. Peanut.
What good would that accomplish?
[I'm hoping you can give me a meaningful answer.]
Also, is there some reason to represent a Mr. Peanut instead of just
a regular
William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:10:26PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
clearly what it is. Duracell has no right in law to stop others from
depicting black oblongs with copper ends. They *do* have a right to
I dare you to package the golden arches
30 matches
Mail list logo
