On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
snip
No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are
GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts are LGPL, parts are GPL with
special libgcc exception, etc.
I don't believe
Hi (gcj mailinglist CCed),
On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 11:12, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
snip
No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are
GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts
Andrew Suffield wrote:
snip
No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are
GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts are LGPL, parts are GPL with
special libgcc exception, etc.
I don't believe there are any LGPL parts.
libf2c/libU77
portions of libiberty
portions of
Matthieu Moy wrote:
[ I know this is out topic here, but I've already sent this mail twice
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], twice to the discussion list of the fsfeurope,
another time to the SystemC mailing list, and didn't get a single
answer :-( ]
Hi,
I've developped a piece of
Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
++ +-+ +-+
|| | | | |
| A | | B | | C |
|| |
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 02:46:39AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
++ +-+ +-+
|| | | | |
| A
[ I know this is out topic here, but I've already sent this mail twice
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], twice to the discussion list of the fsfeurope,
another time to the SystemC mailing list, and didn't get a single
answer :-( ]
Hi,
I've developped a piece of software using GCC as a C++
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
++ +-+ +-+
|| | | | |
| A | | B | | C |
|| | | |
gcc is LGPL.
Diego
I don't know where you got that idea, but it's wrong. Some of the
libraries may be LGPL, but the compiler itself is very much GPL,
to the point that RMS doesn't want people adding interfaces that
might make it easier to use a GCC frontend by itself without
linking to GCC.
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:05:16AM -0800, D. Starner wrote:
gcc is LGPL.
Diego
I don't know where you got that idea, but it's wrong. Some of the
libraries may be LGPL, but the compiler itself is very much GPL,
You are right, I stand corrected.
Diego
Matthieu Moy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I know this is out topic here, but I've already sent this mail twice
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], twice to the discussion list of the fsfeurope,
another time to the SystemC mailing list, and didn't get a single
answer :-( ]
I'm not surprised.
11 matches
Mail list logo