Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-15 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: snip No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts are LGPL, parts are GPL with special libgcc exception, etc. I don't believe

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi (gcj mailinglist CCed), On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 11:12, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: snip No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Andrew Suffield wrote: snip No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts are LGPL, parts are GPL with special libgcc exception, etc. I don't believe there are any LGPL parts. libf2c/libU77 portions of libiberty portions of

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-09 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Matthieu Moy wrote: [ I know this is out topic here, but I've already sent this mail twice to [EMAIL PROTECTED], twice to the discussion list of the fsfeurope, another time to the SystemC mailing list, and didn't get a single answer :-( ] Hi, I've developped a piece of

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-09 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Diego Biurrun wrote: On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: ++ +-+ +-+ || | | | | | A | | B | | C | || |

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 02:46:39AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Diego Biurrun wrote: On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: ++ +-+ +-+ || | | | | | A

Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-06 Thread Matthieu Moy
[ I know this is out topic here, but I've already sent this mail twice to [EMAIL PROTECTED], twice to the discussion list of the fsfeurope, another time to the SystemC mailing list, and didn't get a single answer :-( ] Hi, I've developped a piece of software using GCC as a C++

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-06 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: ++ +-+ +-+ || | | | | | A | | B | | C | || | | |

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-06 Thread D. Starner
gcc is LGPL. Diego I don't know where you got that idea, but it's wrong. Some of the libraries may be LGPL, but the compiler itself is very much GPL, to the point that RMS doesn't want people adding interfaces that might make it easier to use a GCC frontend by itself without linking to GCC.

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-06 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:05:16AM -0800, D. Starner wrote: gcc is LGPL. Diego I don't know where you got that idea, but it's wrong. Some of the libraries may be LGPL, but the compiler itself is very much GPL, You are right, I stand corrected. Diego

Re: Is SystemC license compatible with the GPL ?

2004-05-06 Thread Walter Landry
Matthieu Moy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ I know this is out topic here, but I've already sent this mail twice to [EMAIL PROTECTED], twice to the discussion list of the fsfeurope, another time to the SystemC mailing list, and didn't get a single answer :-( ] I'm not surprised.