Re: Is this BSD-3-Clause Variant DFSG-compliant?

2020-05-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:34 PM Eriberto Mota wrote: > For me it is not DFSG-compatible because I can't see a clause about > allowing modifications in source code. I brought this up on debian-legal a while ago:

Re: Is this BSD-3-Clause Variant DFSG-compliant?

2020-05-24 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 5/24/20 6:33 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: > Today I found the file test/ftp.y, in btyacc package, using the > following license: > > test/ftp.y: * Copyright (c) 1985, 1988 Regents of the University of > California. > test/ftp.y- * All rights reserved. > test/ftp.y- * > test/ftp.y- *

Is this BSD-3-Clause Variant DFSG-compliant?

2020-05-24 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi folks, Today I found the file test/ftp.y, in btyacc package, using the following license: test/ftp.y: * Copyright (c) 1985, 1988 Regents of the University of California. test/ftp.y- * All rights reserved. test/ftp.y- * test/ftp.y- * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are