Hi,
Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped
under a GPL-compatible license? I discovered one of them which
could be problematic.
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped
under a GPL-compatible license?
Pretty much. It is possible to write stand-alone elisp code that only
uses Emacs internals. At that point you are okay, treating Emacs has an
En réponse à Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped
under a GPL-compatible license?
Pretty much. It is possible to write stand-alone elisp code that only
uses Emacs internals.
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En réponse à Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped
under a GPL-compatible license?
Pretty much. It is possible to write
En réponse à Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Err, I thought the license of interpreted programs had to be
compatible with the license of interpreters
I don't think so.
You are right. There answer is there:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InterpreterIncompat
No,
5 matches
Mail list logo