Re: MusicXML 2.0?

2009-08-31 Thread Samuel Thibault
I now realize that I had never received the follow-ups to my mail. Please keep me in Cc. Anthony W. Youngman wrote: Samuel Thibault, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 20:20:25 +0200, a écrit : I would like to package a software which includes some dtd modules licensed under the MusicXML 2.0 license [1

Re: MusicXML 2.0?

2009-06-29 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message 20090628182025.gf14...@const.famille.thibault.fr, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org writes Hello, I would like to package a software which includes some dtd modules licensed under the MusicXML 2.0 license [1]. It looks like a free license, but something catched my attention

Re: MusicXML 2.0?

2009-06-29 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it wrote: On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:45:00 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: A. DEFINITIONS [...] Original Program means the original version of the software accompanying this Agreement as released by Recordare LLC, including source code, object code and

MusicXML 2.0?

2009-06-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I would like to package a software which includes some dtd modules licensed under the MusicXML 2.0 license [1]. It looks like a free license, but something catched my attention: `No one other than Recordare LLC has the right to modify this Agreement.' which I understand as not allowing

Re: MusicXML 2.0?

2009-06-28 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:20:25 +0200 Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, I would like to package a software which includes some dtd modules licensed under the MusicXML 2.0 license [1]. It looks like a free license, but something catched my attention: `No one other than Recordare LLC has the right

Re: MusicXML 2.0?

2009-06-28 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:45:00 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] MusicXML™ Document Type Definition Public License Version 2.0 [...] A. DEFINITIONS Copyright Holder means Recordare LLC. [...] Original Program means the original version of the software accompanying this Agreement as released