Re: OSSAL/CC license of xMule parts

2006-10-20 Thread Weakish Jiang
On 3 Oct 2006, at 05:13, Daniel Leidert wrote: Hello, I'm currently preparing an updated xMule package and found a statement, which sounds a bit problematic. But I'm not a lawyer, so I ask you. E.g. xLibs/DynPrefs/DynamicPreferences.cpp states: // This file is dually licensed under the terms

OSSAL/CC license of xMule parts

2006-10-02 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hello, I'm currently preparing an updated xMule package and found a statement, which sounds a bit problematic. But I'm not a lawyer, so I ask you. E.g. xLibs/DynPrefs/DynamicPreferences.cpp states: // This file is dually licensed under the terms of the following licenses: // * Primary License:

Re: OSSAL/CC license of xMule parts

2006-10-02 Thread Gervase Markham
Daniel Leidert wrote: I'm not sure of any of these licenses is DFSG-free. AFAIK the CC licenses are considered non-free and I'm concerned about the OSSAL too (that forbids linking against GPLed libraries). And the exceptions don't seem to allow Debian to link against GPLed libraries. Can you