On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:55:40PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:52:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
As I recall, the OPL has a thing equivalent to the GNU FDL's Cover
Texts. The GNU FDL's Cover Texts are immutable and unremovable, and
so are the OPL's.
What it
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:08:38PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:55:40PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Don't look now, but Creative Commons publishes somewhere around half a dozen
licenses :-) (Though some are pretty blatantly non-free)
(No ridiculously excessive
Hello,
I have some documentation and documentation-like material that I am getting
ready to release, and figured this would be an opportune time to ask this
question:
What license do people here recommend for doing so?
I like some of the aims of the FDL (*NOT* the invariant sections), such as
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:51:22AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
What license do people here recommend for doing so?
I should add that I want a license that guarantees that all receipients of
modified versions get the full original rights. (Similar to the GPL rather
than BSD in that respect.)
--
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I should add that I want a license that guarantees that all receipients of
modified versions get the full original rights. (Similar to the GPL rather
than BSD in that respect.)
Then use the GPL, version 2 only.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:51:22AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
* Open Publication License; debian-legal archives show
that it may have been considered free at one time but now is
questionable. Can anyone shed some light there?
As I recall, the OPL has a thing equivalent to the GNU FDL's
On 2003-09-10, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I should add that I want a license that guarantees that all receipients of
modified versions get the full original rights. (Similar to the GPL rather
than BSD in that respect.)
Then use the GPL,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:52:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:51:22AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
* Open Publication License; debian-legal archives show
that it may have been considered free at one time but now is
questionable. Can anyone shed some
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:55:40PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Don't look now, but Creative Commons publishes somewhere around half a dozen
licenses :-) (Though some are pretty blatantly non-free)
(No ridiculously excessive license proliferation here, folks! Nope!)
--
Glenn Maynard
9 matches
Mail list logo
