Re: Revised Bacula license

2006-05-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded: Linking: Bacula may be linked with any libraries permitted under the GPL, or with any non-GPLed libraries, including OpenSSL, that are required for its proper functioning, providing the source code of those non-GPLed libraries is non-proprietary and

Re: Revised Bacula license

2006-05-22 Thread Josh Triplett
Kern Sibbald wrote: John Goerzen wrote: Can you all take a look at the below new license? I took a quick look and it looks good to me. This revised license looks DFSG-free to me. One note, though: Linking: Bacula may be linked with any libraries permitted under the GPL, or with any

Re: Revised Bacula license

2006-05-22 Thread MJ Ray
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded: Linking: Bacula may be linked with any libraries permitted under the GPL, or with any non-GPLed libraries, including OpenSSL, that are required for its proper functioning, providing the source code of those non-GPLed libraries is non-proprietary and

Re: Revised Bacula license

2006-05-21 Thread Kern Sibbald
John Goerzen wrote: Can you all take a look at the below new license? I took a quick look and it looks good to me. This revised license looks DFSG-free to me. One note, though: Linking: Bacula may be linked with any libraries permitted under the GPL, or with any non-GPLed libraries,

Re: Revised Bacula license

2006-05-21 Thread Joe Smith
From: Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trademark: The name Bacula is a registered trademark. I assume there is an implicit trademark licence. In this case an implicit licence is probably better than an explicit one, solely because it is virtually impossible to word a trademark licence to allow

Revised Bacula license

2006-05-20 Thread John Goerzen
Hello, Can you all take a look at the below new license? I took a quick look and it looks good to me. Thanks, -- John - Forwarded message from Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:32:11 +0200 (CEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Revised Bacula license

2006-05-20 Thread Josh Triplett
John Goerzen wrote: Can you all take a look at the below new license? I took a quick look and it looks good to me. This revised license looks DFSG-free to me. One note, though: Linking: Bacula may be linked with any libraries permitted under the GPL, or with any non-GPLed libraries,

Re: Revised Bacula license

2006-05-20 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Josh Triplett said: John Goerzen wrote: Can you all take a look at the below new license? I took a quick look and it looks good to me. This revised license looks DFSG-free to me. One note, though: Linking: Bacula may be linked with any libraries