Am 2007-08-14 14:15:15, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le lundi 13 août 2007 à 23:38 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
And more importantly, since Skype is a proprietary, non-standard
protocol designed to undermine the standard and free VoIP protocols,
there is nothing to gain and much to lose by
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:59:05 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Summary: we should spend our time encouraging VoIP solutions built
around open protocols and open standards, instead of engaging in
legalistic wanking for the privilege of distributing software prepared
by our proprietary
Le lundi 13 août 2007 à 23:38 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
And more importantly, since Skype is a proprietary, non-standard
protocol designed to undermine the standard and free VoIP protocols,
there is nothing to gain and much to lose by promoting its use by
anything affiliated with the Debian
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:24:09AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 11109 March 1977, ?ystein Gisn?s wrote:
I got a request from a Skype employee who was eager to distribute
Skype with Debian. I replied that the current license probably is not
compatible with DFSG and promised to ask
On 0 March 1977, Mario Iseli wrote:
I got a request from a Skype employee who was eager to distribute
Skype with Debian. I replied that the current license probably is not
compatible with DFSG and promised to ask debian-legal what has to be
done with Skype's license to make it
On Sunday 12 August 2007 22:53, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I got a request from a Skype employee who was eager to distribute
Skype with Debian. I replied that the current license probably is not
compatible with DFSG and promised to ask debian-legal what has to be
done with Skype's license to make
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But even so, Skype uses a proprietary protocol to gain monopoly
power over internet voice communication, plus they hack around the
NAT problem instead of pushing IPv6 adoption. Skype should not be
used by anoone.
And more importantly, since Skype is
Skype is suitable even for
non-free. So the primary question is What has to change in Skype's
license to make it distributable in non-free?, with the secondary
question being the same for main.
I posted a question about the Skype license back in 2004
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:53:42PM +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I got a request from a Skype employee who was eager to distribute
Skype with Debian. I replied that the current license probably is not
compatible with DFSG
Are you joking?
http://www.skype.com/help/faq/technical.html:
On 11109 March 1977, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I got a request from a Skype employee who was eager to distribute
Skype with Debian. I replied that the current license probably is not
compatible with DFSG and promised to ask debian-legal what has to be
done with Skype's license to make it
This one time, at band camp, Øystein Gisnås said:
I got a request from a Skype employee who was eager to distribute
Skype with Debian. I replied that the current license probably is not
compatible with DFSG and promised to ask debian-legal what has to be
done with Skype's license to make it
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11109 March 1977, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I got a request from a Skype employee who was eager to distribute
Skype with Debian. I replied that the current license probably is
not compatible with DFSG and promised to ask debian-legal what has
to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
