On 2003-10-25 21:20:26 +0100 Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
B No fees or compensation are charged for use, copies, or
access to this software. You may charge a nominal
distribution fee for the physical act of transferring a
copy, but you may not charge for the program itself.
Hi,
I'm about to adopt the Debian package of latex2html. But before, I have
to sort out #204684 [1], a licensing problem (serious, RC). While we got
a license for the code of Mats Dahlgren, the other (and bigger) problem
in the main LaTeX2HTML license remains
not fall under the license of
latex2html. This means that latex2html passes DFSG 9, not that it passes
DFSG 1.
What do you think about it? Should we interpret the DFSG more liberally
and say that the selling is just related to the _aggregation_ of our
packages (that would be a question about
On 2003-10-25, Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 10:20:26PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
Maybe I should add that some files in latex2html are GPL'ed, which
possibly forces us / the maintainer to apply the GPL to the whole
package.
If some files are GPL, then
4 matches
Mail list logo
