Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 01:22:40AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 20:36, Terry Hancock wrote:
Do you mean by this that the US Copyright office does not recognize
bitmap
fonts as copyrightable work? (If so, this
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 20:36, Terry Hancock wrote:
Do you mean by this that the US Copyright office does not recognize bitmap
fonts as copyrightable work? (If so, this would be good to know).
The copyright office does not recognize fonts, period, as a
copyrightable work.
However, it does
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 01:22:40AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 20:36, Terry Hancock wrote:
Do you mean by this that the US Copyright office does not recognize bitmap
fonts as copyrightable work? (If so, this would be good to know).
The copyright office does
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 03:53, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
Note, while this is filed against xfonts-75dpi,
Aren't those bitmap fonts? If so, there is no copyright in the US at
least.
Severity: serious
Package: xfonts-75dpi
Note, while this is filed against xfonts-75dpi, it affects several of
the font packages generated from the xfree86 source package, feel free
to reassign to another package.
The two large groups in question are the Utopia (UT*) and the Lucida
(lu*) fonts.
Scripsit Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: serious
Package: xfonts-75dpi
Standard BTS/mailing list warning follows:
*NEVER* *EVER* crosspost directly between [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and mailing lists!
Doing this means that mailing list subscribers who just do a wide
reply to the
6 matches
Mail list logo
