On Wed, 04 Aug 2004, Jörgen Hägg wrote:
/* | Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software | */
/* | and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby | */
^^^
/* | granted, provided that the above
Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004, Jörgen Hägg wrote:
/* | Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software | */
/* | and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby | */
^^^
/* | granted,
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 09:24, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004, Jörgen Hägg wrote:
/* | Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software | */
/* | and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby | */
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:00:10PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Looks fine to me.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:49:49PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Looks OK
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:34:10PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
It looks like a 2-clause BSD license.
It's perfectly fine and
This is the copyright I found in a program I'd like to package.
Is it acceptable for 'main' or should I ask for a better copyright?
The copyright itself in the README:
/* +---+ */
/* | Copyright 1991, YYY.
Jörgen Hägg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the copyright I found in a program I'd like to package.
Is it acceptable for 'main' or should I ask for a better copyright?
Looks fine to me.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:16:47PM +0200, Jörgen Hägg wrote:
This is the copyright I found in a program I'd like to package.
Is it acceptable for 'main' or should I ask for a better copyright?
Looks OK
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:16:47 +0200 Jörgen Hägg wrote:
This is the copyright I found in a program I'd like to package.
Is it acceptable for 'main' or should I ask for a better copyright?
[...]
And in COPYING:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification,
8 matches
Mail list logo
