On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 03:09:18PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 16:32 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:50:36AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > > Ingo Ruhnke wrote:
> > >
> > > >Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required t
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 16:32 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:50:36AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > Ingo Ruhnke wrote:
> >
> > >Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required to
> > >confirm to it, but the interface which generates the input for the
>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:50:36AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Ingo Ruhnke wrote:
>
> >Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required to
> >confirm to it, but the interface which generates the input for the
> >library. So to me it looks basically just like something like
Ingo Ruhnke wrote:
Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required to
confirm to it, but the interface which generates the input for the
library. So to me it looks basically just like something like GPLs 2c
section applied to the web.
Not really. GPL 2(c) tells me what changes I m
Ingo Ruhnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sound free to me, since not the output of the library is required to
> confirm to it, but the interface which generates the input for the
> library. So to me it looks basically just like something like GPLs 2c
> section applied to the web.
I think there's a
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* 5. Applications using cl-typesetting like Web servers, Web applications
*native applications, and other software applications must insert
*the following acknowledgment on the same page/windo
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> * 5. Applications using cl-typesetting like Web servers, Web applications
> >> *native applications, and other software applications must insert
> >> *the following acknowledgment on the same page/window than the
> >> interface
> >> *
Scripsit Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> While investigating the packaging of cl-typesetting I noticed that the
> copyright looks a little strange and would like options on it. At a first
> glance it does seem to be DFSG 'free', but I get a strange feeling about
> it. Opinions?
>> * 5. App
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
While investigating the packaging of cl-typesetting I noticed that the
copyright looks a little strange and would like options on it. At a first
glance it does seem to be DFSG 'free', but I get a strange feeling about
it. Opinions?
License:
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
