On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:56:56PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
I am the maintainer of qterm and I am checking the license issue in qterm.
qterm is release under GPL-2+ as a whole, and the source files are
released under GPL-2+, LGPL-2.1+, BSD-2 and others.
qterm/ssh/getput.h is released under
On Jan 10, 2008 8:52 AM, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and if the derived work is incompatible with the protocol
description in the RFC file, it must be called by a name other
than ssh or Secure Shell.
This may be a problem. However, to me it seems this just
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:10:34 + John Halton wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 8:52 AM, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and if the derived work is incompatible with the protocol
description in the RFC file, it must be called by a name other
than ssh or Secure Shell.
Hello,
I am the maintainer of qterm and I am checking the license issue in qterm.
qterm is release under GPL-2+ as a whole, and the source files are
released under GPL-2+, LGPL-2.1+, BSD-2 and others.
qterm/ssh/getput.h is released under following license[1]. And I don't
know whether it's OK to
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:56:56 +0800 LI Daobing wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
[...]
qterm is release under GPL-2+ as a whole, and the source files are
released under GPL-2+, LGPL-2.1+, BSD-2 and others.
qterm/ssh/getput.h is released under following license[1]. And I don't
know whether it's OK to
5 matches
Mail list logo