On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:41:34AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
If the copyright holder includes a copy of the GPL but writes that the
software is licensed under the GPL plus additional restrictions, then
this is not illegal as far as I know (there's nothing in the GPL
that prevents it
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Brian May wrote:
Quoting README, in particular the entire LICENSING section:
[Snip text about Hans Reiser assuming the right to re-license contributed
work if it's not clearly labelled otherwise. I don't have an opinion on
the legality of it, but it doesn't sound
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:54:26AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
Well, doesn't the GPL say something on it being illegal to impose additional
restrictions on distribution?
If the restriction is agreed upon by all copyright holders, then the issue
is murky; as far as I
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, doesn't the GPL say something on it being illegal to impose
additional
restrictions on distribution?
If the restriction is agreed upon by all copyright holders, then the issue
is murky; as far as I know, there's no consensus on this issue on
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op za 19-04-2003, om 22:51 schreef Lukas Geyer:
the issue seems to be the fix of #152547. If we are not allowed to
remove a screenful of advertising from the output of a program, then
this unduly restricts the freedom to distribute modified versions.
[subscribed to -legal, not to -devel; Cc: accordingly]
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:24:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op za 19-04-2003, om 22:51 schreef Lukas Geyer:
the issue seems to be the fix of #152547. If we are not allowed to
remove a screenful of advertising from the output of a
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You'll note that ReiserFS anticipated the GNU GPL V3 by including
clauses that forbid removal of credits in its license, and for a long
time I have been telling Stallman that he needs to get V3 of the GPL
Op za 19-04-2003, om 22:51 schreef Lukas Geyer:
the issue seems to be the fix of #152547. If we are not allowed to
remove a screenful of advertising from the output of a program, then
this unduly restricts the freedom to distribute modified versions.
Uhm.
From the GPL, section 2:
c) If
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:24:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op za 19-04-2003, om 22:51 schreef Lukas Geyer:
the issue seems to be the fix of #152547. If we are not allowed to
remove a screenful of advertising from the output of a program, then
this unduly restricts the freedom to
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:24:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op za 19-04-2003, om 22:51 schreef Lukas Geyer:
the issue seems to be the fix of #152547. If we are not allowed to
remove a screenful of advertising from the output of a program, then
this unduly restricts the freedom to
10 matches
Mail list logo
