Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:39:32PM -0500, Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not saying the patent issue should be ignored. It just strikes me
as silly to even start comparing Theora with H.264.
Certain graphic artists would say the same of GIMP
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:39:32 -0500 Arc Riley wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:09:39AM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
[...]
The patent situation is unfortunate. Nevertheless, the H.264 codec
is being adopted by broadcasters throughout the world. For good or
bad, the codec is here to stay for
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:01:55 -0500 Arc Riley wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:45:12PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
[...]
That said, VP3/Theora can hardly compare with H.264 in terms of
coding efficiency. There really is no viable alternative in some
situations. Microsoft's WMV9/VC1 comes
wrote:
David Liontooth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would you consider packaging x264 for Debian? My experience with your
unofficial packages has been excellent on both x86 and amd64. Even
though the library is still labeled in early development, it appears
to be mature enough to be clearly useful
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:26:56PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Are there objections to including the new H.264 encoder in Debian?
For details, see bug 354667 (request for packaging).
Debian maintainer Christian Marillat currently maintains an unofficial
package, and we would like your
Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:26:56PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Are there objections to including the new H.264 encoder in Debian?
For details, see bug 354667 (request for packaging).
Debian maintainer Christian Marillat currently maintains an
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:45:12PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
The codec has dozens of different corporations holding patents over
it, who will try to extract royalties for it in countries where
those patents are upheld (ie, USA), and giving it this is free
because it's GPL hurts truely
Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:45:12PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
The codec has dozens of different corporations holding patents over
it, who will try to extract royalties for it in countries where
those patents are upheld (ie, USA), and giving it this is
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:09:39AM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
Sure, On2 has allowed free use of *its* patents relating to VP3. That
doesn't mean that some obscure company will pop up out of nowhere with
a bunch of patents they claim *also* apply to VP3, and that On2 has
been infringing all
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:39:32PM -0500, Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not saying the patent issue should be ignored. It just strikes me
as silly to even start comparing Theora with H.264.
Certain graphic artists would say the same of GIMP vs Photoshop, or compare
their
10 matches
Mail list logo
