Re: eawpats license [was: Timidity-patches eek]

2002-09-11 Thread J.B. Nicholson-Owens
In addition to David Given's warning, which I agree with and I find reason enough to not consider eawpats DFSG-free, I add the following. Andrew Suffield quoted the license for eawpats: So, basicly[sic] you can not use the analog drums or the pistol files in any commercial work. This is out of

Re: eawpats license [was: Timidity-patches eek]

2002-09-11 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
J.B. Nicholson-Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I release these patches as fameware. If you use them in any non-private way, give me credit. These patches are not to be sold for profit (heaven forbid). They were free when I got them and so they shall remain. Here's where my problem lies:

Re: Debian registered by a trade as TM in Spain!

2002-09-11 Thread Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:59:45AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: The barrapunto article makes it clear that the academy (hmm, perhaps trade school is better English?) is not holding this trademark for the benefit of the Debian community. academy is right: academy n 1: a secondary

Re: License issue with freeswan (Eric Young's libdes)

2002-09-11 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 13:23:28 +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: Freeswan upstream developers are currently thinking of switch to openssl. I already pointed out to them that this might need a change in their own (GPL) license statement so that linking to openssl is explicitly allowed. Perhaps you

Re: License issue with freeswan (Eric Young's libdes)

2002-09-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: The reason why freeswan can currently not go into main is an issue with some code license that is bundled with it. I am struggling with this for quite some time now and at the moment I need some help to clarify it Freeswan

Re: License issue with freeswan (Eric Young's libdes)

2002-09-11 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: | Which parts of freeswan link against libdes? According to | /usr/share/doc/freeswan/copyright, some parts are LGPL. Do we know for | sure that libdes+GPL is happening? No, not for sure. However, since the copyright situation

Re: License issue with freeswan (Eric Young's libdes)

2002-09-11 Thread Joey Hess
Rene Mayrhofer wrote: Freeswan (the user space daemon and the kernel module) needs Eric Young's libdes to work. I know from researching for mindterm that version 3.06 of Eric Young's libdes (from 1993) was licensed under the GPL. I don't know how much the libdes library has changed since then,