Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about this (to be formatted in bold in the HTML, though we'd
lose that in ASCII)
Less shouty, so that's a good thing. Whether it passes the test of
conspicuous as required under U.S. UCC, I don't know.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:56:56PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
I am the maintainer of qterm and I am checking the license issue in qterm.
qterm is release under GPL-2+ as a whole, and the source files are
released under GPL-2+, LGPL-2.1+, BSD-2 and others.
qterm/ssh/getput.h is released under
On Jan 10, 2008 8:52 AM, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and if the derived work is incompatible with the protocol
description in the RFC file, it must be called by a name other
than ssh or Secure Shell.
This may be a problem. However, to me it seems this just
hi d-legal,
I am taking care of the (forthcoming) freevo packages.
Some artwork is covered by the attached Design Science License.
Is it fine to include that stuff in the package and upload?
(I would say yes, but you may have a more informed opinion).
a.
DESIGN SCIENCE LICENSE
TERMS AND
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:18:00PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
hi d-legal,
I am taking care of the (forthcoming) freevo packages.
Some artwork is covered by the attached Design Science License.
Is it fine to include that stuff in the package and upload?
(I would say yes, but you may have a
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:10:34 + John Halton wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 8:52 AM, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and if the derived work is incompatible with the protocol
description in the RFC file, it must be called by a name other
than ssh or Secure Shell.
6 matches
Mail list logo
