In message 49c9a819.rvf2v61xchuvg7vu%...@phonecoop.coop, MJ Ray
m...@phonecoop.coop writes
Olive not0read0...@yopmail.com wrote:
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
I don't see why authors of derived works have to grant the additional
permissions. Where is that requirement?
To distribute
In message 20090324232043.2789e...@pcolivier.chezmoi.net, Olive
not0read0...@yopmail.com writes
Any derivative work is covered by the FLTK license and that include the
additional permissions. It is my understanding that you cannot change
the license at all unless it is explicitly permitted and I
Matthew Johnson writes (Re: The copyright of a keyboard mapping and its
implementation):
Well, if we take the position that it's not copyrightable then for our
point of view it's not a problem what the licence is, we can distribute
in main. It's also not a problem form his PoV, because he's
I don't think there are any problems with the AGPL and indeed I might
well consider using the AGPL for works of my own. I don't have time
now to write a detailed rebuttal to each of Bill's points, I'm afraid.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
4 matches
Mail list logo
