On 02/26/2018 01:54 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you please clarify if the license below can be considered
> DFSG-compatible ?
>
> Section 2 doesn't sound very good, but section 3 says that GPL-2+ may be
> applied.
> Will it be fine to simply state that it is licensed under GPL-2+
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 22:21:01 +0100 Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
[...]
> Thank you all for such a detailed answers!
You're welcome!
>
> I found the following in the FAQ[0]:
>
> 3.2. Is InChI open?
>
> It is intended that the source code is freely re-usable and a license
> has been developed to refl
2 matches
Mail list logo
