be packaged, and if it can,
should it go into main or non-free?
I have attatched the license.
- - --
Stephen Stafford
GPG public key on request
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
if they
object/embrace the idea of it being packaged for Debian.
--
Stephen Stafford
GPG public key on request
that they aren't the
only volunteers in the chain, and credit for authorship is not just a
perk: it's the law in this case.
Nobody is denying this. /usr/share/doc/foo should state where the
package is from and who the original author is somewhere.
- --
Stephen Stafford
GPG public key on request
-BEGIN
...it is a description of the system. The system
(in its base form at least) comprises the Linux kernel and the GNU *nix
tools.
It is not IMO advertisment or recognition. It is a statement of what
the system contains at its base level (apache is higher than that)
--
Stephen Stafford
GPG public key
understand more about licensing issues than I do will let me know
that I am wrong.
Thank you for your interest and time,
Regards
- --
Stephen Stafford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get GPG public key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info
reading of the clause was
in fact correct. This led to me having to withdraw the ITP.
IMO (and I stress IANAL) the point you raise probably prevents us from
distributing it, and part (vi) which I pasted above *definitely*
prevents us from distributing it.
Cheers,
--
Stephen Stafford
finger
damages.
As I indicated before. If you wish to assert that I am wrong and why I
am wrong then I will withdraw my objection.
standard IANAL disclaimer
- --
Stephen Stafford
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get gpg public key
I subscribe to most debian-* lists I post to, but a CC direct to me
will ensure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 14 Oct 2001 6:38 am, Stephen Zander wrote:
Please continue to CC Juergen and I, we're not on -legal
Stephen == Stephen Stafford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Stephen Read it again. This is clause 3 of the supplemental
Stephen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 14 Oct 2001 6:52 pm, you wrote:
Stephen == Stephen Stafford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Stephen I am sorry, but licenses which start to talk about
Stephen indemnifying immediately start warning bells in my head.
Stephen
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
c. to defend and indemnify Sun and its licensors from and
against any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement amounts
and/or expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in
connection with any claim, lawsuit or action by any
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
W li?cie z pi?, 12-07-2002, godz. 11:50, Markus Klink pisze:
but what is so problematic about the license?
disclaimer
I am not a lawyer, only a developer. I am not authoritative about
what's really wrong. However I'll
Hi,
I am in the process of discussions with upstream about the licensing for a
new package.
The package build system is autoconf based.
Upstream really likes the Artistic license and would prefer to release with
that.
Is there any incompatibility with using the Artistic license when using an
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:09:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Part 1. DFSG-freeness of the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2
Please mark with an X the item that most closely approximates your
opinion. Mark only one.
[ ] The GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.2, as
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:11:14AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
Let's play fair now:
From WordNet (r) 1.7 :
software
n : (computer science) written programs or procedures or rules
and associated documentation pertaining to the operation
of a computer
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:25:03PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
As have I, but I have had to resort to using non free tools on
a non free OS to do so. Are you aware of free software that would
allow me to directly edit PDF files? If not, then Florian may have a
point.
Umm, vi
would greatly appreciate if you kept the bug log
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the CC list.
Cheers,
Stephen
--
Stephen Stafford | Development and support consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.clothcat.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Never put off until tomorrow what you can
it :)
Cheers,
--
Stephen Stafford | Development and support consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.clothcat.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Never put off until tomorrow what you can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | con someone into doing for you today
17 matches
Mail list logo
