On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:25 AM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:55 AM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have any thoughts about this?
>
> I talked to one of RedHat's lawyers and they mentioned that they have
> dealt with this problem too and concluded that these licenses were
>
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:55 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> conserver package is in non-free because of this issue but it appears a
> lot of people did not notice the lack of modification permission.
...
> https://www.conserver.com/pipermail/users/2019-July/msg1.html
Due to the interpretation provided
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:55 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> Does anyone have any thoughts about this?
I talked to one of RedHat's lawyers and they mentioned that they have
dealt with this problem too and concluded that these licenses were
intended to cover modification. The current wording of the initial
Hi all,
There are several packages (including GCC and Linux) in Debian that
contain files released under several different BSDish licenses that are
missing the explicit modification permission. Many of these files
contain comments indicating that they likely have been modified. I
think that these
4 matches
Mail list logo
