Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:47:58 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only if those graphics files are directly loadable from their Source
form. [...]
=20
Otherwise, you make a modified work and the meanings of Source
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:42:11 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If, on the other hand, you make a dummy modification to an Object
Form just to claim that it is Source Data, then I think that you are
cheating with the license... For instance, I would
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:29:15 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
It seems impractical, but the definition of Object Form and the terms
for modified versions make it look to me like it's avoidable by loading
the graphic at run-time instead of compiling it into
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:47:58 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:29:15 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
It seems impractical, but the definition of Object Form and the terms
for modified versions make it look to me like it's avoidable by
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see one possible issue with this license: clause 3(a) states
| (a) The Source Data is included in the same distribution, distributed
| under the terms of this License; or
while the other two options are non-free (just as in the GNU GPL).
Option
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:29:15 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see one possible issue with this license: clause 3(a) states
| (a) The Source Data is included in the same distribution, distributed
| under the terms of this License; or
while the
A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some artwork is covered by the attached Design Science License.
Thank you for including the license text in full for examination.
It appears to be identical to the text published at (not published
*by*, note!) the Free Software Foundation on their site
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:18:00 +0100 A Mennucc wrote:
hi d-legal,
Hi! :)
[...]
Some artwork is covered by the attached Design Science License.
Is it fine to include that stuff in the package and upload?
(I would say yes, but you may have a more informed opinion).
The DSL has already been
hi d-legal,
I am taking care of the (forthcoming) freevo packages.
Some artwork is covered by the attached Design Science License.
Is it fine to include that stuff in the package and upload?
(I would say yes, but you may have a more informed opinion).
a.
DESIGN SCIENCE LICENSE
TERMS AND
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:18:00PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
hi d-legal,
I am taking care of the (forthcoming) freevo packages.
Some artwork is covered by the attached Design Science License.
Is it fine to include that stuff in the package and upload?
(I would say yes, but you may have a
10 matches
Mail list logo
