Re: Bug#614390: cmake provides files under proprietary license

2011-02-23 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello,

this bug is serious (i.e. the file is not shippable), isn't it? Problematic 
copyright notice is below.

P.S. cmake in Debian does not use them in any way because they are 1) windows-
only 2) we use system libarchive. Those files are in orig tarball only.

#/* FILE: mvcpp.nt
# *
# *  Copyright (c) 2008
# *  TouchNet Information Systems, Inc.
# *  All Rights Reserved
# *
# *  This program is an unpublished copyright work of TouchNet Information
# *  Systems, Inc. of Lenexa, KS.  The program, all information disclosed
# *  and the matter shown and described hereon or herewith are confidential
# *  and proprietary to TouchNet Information Systems, Inc.
# *
# 
**
# *
# * $LastChangedBy: kientzle $
# * $Locker: $
# * $ProjectName: $
# * $ProjectRevision: $
# * $LastChangedRevision: 29 $
# * $LastChangedDate: 2008-05-05 18:10:33 -0400 (Mon, 05 May 2008) $
# * $State$
# * $RCSfile$
# * $Source$
# *
# * Change Log:
# * $Log: $
# *
# */


On pirmadienis 21 Vasaris 2011 18:49:03 Vasily Gurevich wrote:
 Subject: cmake provides files under proprietary license
 Package: cmake
 Version: 2.8.2-2
 Severity: normal
 
 There are couple of files inside orig tarball which are under proprietary
 license
 
 cmake_2.8.2.orig/cmake-2.8.2/Utilities/cmlibarchive/build/windows/mvcpp.nt
 cmake_2.8.2.orig/cmake-2.8.2/Utilities/cmlibarchive/build/windows/wccpp.nt
 
 
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: 6.0
   APT prefers stable
   APT policy: (500, 'stable')
 Architecture: i386 (i686)
 
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
 Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Bug#614390: cmake provides files under proprietary license

2011-02-23 Thread MJ Ray
Modestas Vainius wrote:
 this bug is serious (i.e. the file is not shippable), isn't it? Problematic 
 copyright notice is below.

The copyright notice is false (the confidentiality has been broken)
but I see no permission to distribute, so your claim seems correct.

Hope that helps,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110223195054.25001f7...@nail.towers.org.uk