Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2016-01-23 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:20:21 -0500 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:23:22PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Any other debian-legal regular willing to share his/her opinion? > > Without looking further into it (anyone have a source package I can look > at?), any license that

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-12-25 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Let me comment as the apparent current maintainer of the sgml-data packahge. On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > In that copyright file I see an email (did anyone followup)? > > At 12:51 PM 3/22/99 -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Adam was the original maintaner.

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-12-13 Thread stressware2
[I sent this before, but it seems it did not go through.] It has been a while since your last response. Have you looked further into it?

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-12-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:20:21 -0500 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:23:22PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Any other debian-legal regular willing to share his/her opinion? > > Without looking further into it [...] > any license that restricts use to only that of

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-12-01 Thread stressware2
> In that copyright file I see an email (did anyone followup)? The email you are referring to seems to be for files other than the ones in question; also, the files referred to in the email are under the copyright of W3C, while the files in question are under the copyright of ISO.

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-12-01 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
In that copyright file I see an email (did anyone followup)? At 12:51 PM 3/22/99 -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: >Hello. I have the responsibility of assessing the current copyright >of W3C DTDs accompanying your specifications, on behalf of the Debian >project .

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-11-30 Thread stressware2
> [C]an someone reply with a bad source package (or d/copyright file) > that we can evaluate in main? Here is sgml-data's copyright file: . Here is the source of sgml-data:

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-11-30 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:20:21PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I'm cc'ing the rest of the ftp-master team; can someone reply with a bad > source > package (or d/copyright file) that we can evaluate in main? (actually cc'ing them now) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-11-30 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:23:22PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > Any other debian-legal regular willing to share his/her opinion? Without looking further into it (anyone have a source package I can look at?), any license that restricts use to only that of implementing a standard (and not

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-11-30 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:39:19 +0100 stresswa...@ruggedinbox.com wrote: > > Please note that IANADD, I am just a Debian external contributor. > > I don't speak on behalf of the Debian Project or of the Debian FTP > > Masters: please contact them, if you want to know their opinion. > > How would I

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-11-29 Thread stressware2
> Please note that IANADD, I am just a Debian external contributor. > I don't speak on behalf of the Debian Project or of the Debian FTP > Masters: please contact them, if you want to know their opinion. How would I contact them? > Among other things, I noticed that also fbreader includes files

Re: Non-Free SGML entity files

2015-11-29 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 07:32:46 +0100 stresswa...@ruggedinbox.com wrote: > The package sgml-data includes non-Free files in the > sgml/entities/sgml-iso-entities*/ directories and the > sgml/html/entities/ directory under the following licence: > > 'Permission to copy in any form is granted for