Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend

2019-10-11 Thread Dr. Michael Stehmann


Hello,

yes, j-lawyer is Free Software, so everybody can use, studx, share and
improve it.

But it still has to be packed as a debian package.

That is a manageable task (IMO) and a good next thing to do (IMO).

Kind regards
Michael









Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend

2019-10-11 Thread Michael Guck

Hi Michael,

hi all,

I would like to set up a GDPR compliant install of a system with some 
common sofortware like email and so on for debian lex. Thats much more 
work at basic stuff for a system then many people would expect.  It cant 
be done by one person.


I never published my system. That takes me in position to think over and 
be free for a clear view.


I can not use j-lawer so this might be a step forward for someone, not 
for me.


I am Lawyer and developer (C++/PHP) and want to get things done properly.

I dont want again java, I really tried hard to avoid this but it still 
remains in minds of people as usefull. I better go with C++.


Best Greetings

Michael Guck


Am 11.10.19 um 09:45 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann:

Hello,

yes, j-lawyer is Free Software, so everybody can use, studx, share and
improve it.

But it still has to be packed as a debian package.

That is a manageable task (IMO) and a good next thing to do (IMO).

Kind regards
Michael












Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend

2019-10-11 Thread Michael Guck

Hello Jens,

maybe Mechthildes impulse to just build an deb file out of projects was 
right.


It will not bring "debian lex" alife but gets something done by using 
debian as publishing platform regadless of the circumstances.


I am out here for now.

Maybe I will join again.

best wishes

Michael Guck



Am 11.10.19 um 11:32 schrieb i...@j-lawyer.org:
I feel (kind of) irritated and sorry. Sorry mainly because my project 
is the subject / trigger for this debate. Not so much sorry because I 
did not offend anyone.


I did not insist my project be a part of a potential blend. All I did 
was raising awareness that there is some case management software that 
is working on Linux that could give users a choice.


At the end of the day, that is the only reason I am subscribed here - 
I like the idea of having such a blend that actually provides a value 
to end users. Contributors running apart over the slightest technical 
debate is something that I have not seen in a community so far. Having 
differing opinions is actually something very valuable - getting out 
of your own bubbles and understanding other peoples points and ideas.


Aside from that, I actually agree with Michaels take on getting the 
basics right and then evolve from this.


Baffled,
Jens



Am 11.10.2019 11:09, schrieb Michael Guck:

OK I just found it

https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe

good luck anyway

Michael Guck


Am 11.10.19 um 11:03 schrieb Michael Guck:

Hi Andreas,

how can I get out of this list?

Thank you!

Michael Guck


Am 11.10.19 um 10:53 schrieb Andreas Tille:

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Michael Guck wrote:

Hi Mechthilde,

so we come to no conclusion this time
I don't understand it this way:  Mechthilde has drawn the 
conclusion to
do something (which I'm applauding).  She is following her point of 
view.

You are free to not contribute but that magical "we" that is not able
to find a conclusion does not seem to exist.
I still think that its a good idea to start with the basics and 
later on

everybody can unsecure his system/blend as he wishes.

If you think its a good idea just *do* what you consider a good idea.
Expecting others to consider your idea good is not very fruitful.

Kind regards

    Andreas.










Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend

2019-10-11 Thread Mechtilde
Hello

Am 11.10.19 um 12:58 schrieb Michael Guck:
> Hello Jens,
> 
> maybe Mechthildes impulse to just build an deb file out of projects was
> right.

I want all required software to be available as Debian packages. This is
IMO the base to start a blend.

> It will not bring "debian lex" alife but gets something done by using
> debian as publishing platform regadless of the circumstances.

@ Michael G.: do you find all software you use as packages in Debian?

Kind regards
-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature