checks/fields rewrite

2004-03-15 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Heya, I looked through the lintian bug list and (after that) read some source code a few days ago. The check/fields script seemed to be pretty unmaintainable (the signs were things like a large, unreachable chunk of code) and i wanted to change that. I've rewritten the thing (more or less) from

The NEW ISSUE STOCK I was telling you about, Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:28:05 -0500

2004-03-15 Thread Al Yarbrough
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:28:05 -0500 Here is that new issue stock. Looks like it has now started to make its move. http://otcbb.com/asp/quotes.asp?Quotes=pwrmBullet.x=85Bullet.y=5 Al Yarbrough

Re: Lintian complaints for qemu-fast

2004-03-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
IMHO, this should be an override, and the description is wrong, people should only complain to us if it's a generic false positive, not if it's some kind of special case... Comments? Quite some descriptions are wrong in this regard IMHO. --Jeroen On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:40:43AM +1100, Paul

Re: Lintian complaints for qemu-fast

2004-03-15 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:46:49AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: IMHO, this should be an override, and the description is wrong, people should only complain to us if it's a generic false positive, not if it's some kind of special case... Comments? Quite some descriptions are wrong in

Processing of lintian_1.22.12_powerpc.changes

2004-03-15 Thread Archive Administrator
lintian_1.22.12_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_1.22.12.dsc lintian_1.22.12.tar.gz lintian_1.22.12_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

lintian_1.22.12_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: lintian_1.22.12.dsc to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.22.12.dsc lintian_1.22.12.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.22.12.tar.gz lintian_1.22.12_all.deb to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.22.12_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 118080

Bug#234608: marked as done (does not know about title debconf template type)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#234379: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#233740: marked as done (lintian: false postrm-unsafe-ldconfig warning)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#233740: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#229460: marked as done (lintian: Shouldn't complain about non-executable menu-method)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#229460: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#216536: marked as done ([FP: checks/fields] depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version, coreutils is kind of new)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#216536: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#215235: marked as done (do not complain about statically linked binary in *-static package)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#215235: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#212811: marked as done (etktab: shell-script-fails-syntax-check ./usr/bin/eTktab)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#212811: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#198615: marked as done ([documentation] manpage doesn't list --section option)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#198615: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#192278: marked as done (False positive on copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#192278: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#214231: marked as done (lintian suggests policy violation (Build-Depends, debhelper, dh_clean))

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#192037: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#202950: marked as done (lintian: should not complain about Build-Depends: debheler on Arch: all package)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#192037: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#188245: marked as done (lintian: lintian refers to wrong debhelper manpage)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#188245: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#161820: marked as done ([FP: checks/scripts] killall-is-dangerous (WS script parsing))

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#161820: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#192300: marked as done (Dupe without useful info, see #148548 instead)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#148548: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#118080: marked as done (symlink-up-and-and-down-segments: remove any exceptions)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#118080: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#200280: marked as done ([FP: checks/fields] bad-relation (WS parsing))

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#200280: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#218543: marked as done (lintian: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig fails to recognize indented code)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#218543: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#232849: marked as done (lintian: Warn about large /usr/share in arch-dependant packages)

2004-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#232849: fixed in lintian 1.22.12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now