| --=-=-= | Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable | | On 10403 March 1977, Jari Aalto wrote: | | > | > While they are listed in there at the page, they seem to be | > | > rejection criterias. At least my package "jwm" submittal was | > | > refused for upload until extra "# dh_*" lines were removed. | > | Hrm, and this was the only reason it was rejected? | > Yes. If I remember correct. I do not have the mail at hand any more, | > but the indication to leave those extra template added "# dh_" | > statements were not tolerated. | | Now, if you would actually check whats going on with your package you | would see that it went in on 01.09.2005! | | The only reject you got was automatic as you havent uploaded the | orig.tar.gz with the first upload.
I remember that , thanks. But in addition to this I remember receiving a message where someone (?) instructed to remove all extra "# dh_*" lines. There reasoning was something like patch "being difficult to read" and therefore I should clean up the debian/rules file I would myself kept those lines in there, because if more features were added to the package later it would help to just uncomment relevant lline and not need to read for separate dh_* pages. Anyway, If I remember incorrectly that the "dh_" episode was instructional only, I may have interpreted is as "rejection criteria". If so, then the "W:" is correct in lintian. Thanks for clearance, Jari -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]