Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
retitle 347510 make distinction between menu policy and menu documentation
clearer
Bug#347510: lintian: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format needs updating/removing
Changed Bug title.
End
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
# rest of the patch already applied independently
retitle 347169 [new check] warn about using X meta packages in dependencies
Bug#347169: avoid dependencies on x metapackages;
Author: djpig
Date: 2006-01-19 14:10:30 +0100 (Thu, 19 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 540
Modified:
trunk/checks/scripts.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Make mknod-in-maintainer-script an error since this is now
a must in policy. Pointed out by Bartosz Fenski (Closes: #344928)
Modified:
Author: djpig
Date: 2006-01-19 14:16:38 +0100 (Thu, 19 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 541
Modified:
trunk/checks/scripts
trunk/checks/scripts.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
dpkg --print-installation-architecture is deprecated
so delete dpkg-print-architecture-in-maintainer-script
Modified:
Author: djpig
Date: 2006-01-19 14:18:14 +0100 (Thu, 19 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 542
Modified:
trunk/testset/tags.debconf
Log:
Update for changes in checks/debconf
Modified: trunk/testset/tags.debconf
===
---
Author: djpig
Date: 2006-01-19 14:22:11 +0100 (Thu, 19 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 543
Modified:
trunk/checks/debhelper
Log:
Apparently forgot to add emacs magic header here
Modified: trunk/checks/debhelper
===
---
Author: djpig
Date: 2006-01-19 14:28:21 +0100 (Thu, 19 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 544
Modified:
trunk/checks/debhelper
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Indicate where we found which compat version in
declares-possibly-conflicting-debhelper-compat-versions
(Closes: #329953)
Modified:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r540 by djpig
tag 344928 + pending
Bug#344928: lintian: warns instead of output error when postinst uses mknod
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r544 by djpig
tag 329953 + pending
Bug#329953: [checks/debhelper] ...-conflicting-debhelper-compat-versions should
indicate where it found the versions
There were no tags set.
Tags
Author: djpig
Date: 2006-01-19 15:13:25 +0100 (Thu, 19 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 548
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Prepare for release
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog 2006-01-19
See #253011 for a bug requesting the opposite (i.e. disabling the
check that we had for this).
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:38:24PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
It would be nice if lintian would check whether the man page for a
program is in the right section, i.e. for stuff in /usr/bin and
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-19 15:08]:
See #253011 for a bug requesting the opposite (i.e. disabling the
check that we had for this).
Perhaps Colin can comment whether the argument in #253011 is sound.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r547 by djpig
tag 348380 + pending
Bug#348380: lintian doesn't match all ways of setting DH_COMPAT in debian/rules
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping
lintian_1.23.15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_1.23.15.dsc
lintian_1.23.15.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.15_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
lintian_1.23.15.dsc
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.15.dsc
lintian_1.23.15.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.15.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.15_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.15_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 234531
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321135: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329953: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339750: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#343865: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344609: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344899: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344928: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#346335: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348380: fixed in lintian 1.23.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:28:48PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-19 15:08]:
See #253011 for a bug requesting the opposite (i.e. disabling the
check that we had for this).
Perhaps Colin can comment whether the argument in #253011 is sound.
25 matches
Mail list logo
