Processed: tagging 407528

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 tags 407528 moreinfo Bug#407528: packages containing .pc files should generally depend on pkgconfig There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing

Bug#421345: lintian: does not alert on non-conffile symlink in /etc

2007-04-28 Thread Marc Haber
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.29 Severity: normal Hi, having a non-conffile symlink in /etc causes data loss on package installation if the symlink name was already there as a file (#420578). The file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile check does not seem to fire for symlinks. Please consider

Bug#421345: lintian: does not alert on non-conffile symlink in /etc

2007-04-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.29 Severity: normal (New feature requests are really wishlist, even if the feature would be very nice to have. I try to keep normal for false positives and similar problems that can lead people to not use lintian at all.)

Processed: severity of 421345 is wishlist

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 severity 421345 wishlist Bug#421345: lintian: does not alert on non-conffile symlink in /etc Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#296285: marked as done ([reporting/html_reports] don't show removed packages on the webpages)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:30:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296285: [reporting/html_reports] don't show removed packages on the webpages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

lintian: r875 - in trunk: debian reporting

2007-04-28 Thread rra
Author: rra Date: 2007-04-29 01:29:46 +0200 (Sun, 29 Apr 2007) New Revision: 875 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/reporting/harness trunk/reporting/html_reports Log: * reporting/harness: + [RA] Include overridden tags in the lintian output so that we can do statistical

lintian: r876 - trunk/debian

2007-04-28 Thread rra
Author: rra Date: 2007-04-29 01:33:08 +0200 (Sun, 29 Apr 2007) New Revision: 876 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Finalize changes for 1.23.30. Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2007-04-28

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r875

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r875 by rra tag 305173 + pending Bug#305173: lintian.debian.org: discern between maintainer not found and no lintian errors There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks

lintian: r877 - releases

2007-04-28 Thread rra
Author: rra Date: 2007-04-29 01:36:31 +0200 (Sun, 29 Apr 2007) New Revision: 877 Added: releases/1.23.30/ Log: Tag 1.23.30 release. Copied: releases/1.23.30 (from rev 876, trunk) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Processing of lintian_1.23.30_i386.changes

2007-04-28 Thread Archive Administrator
lintian_1.23.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_1.23.30.dsc lintian_1.23.30.tar.gz lintian_1.23.30_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#419446: marked as done (debian-rules-missing-required-target false positive with phony targets)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419446: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#420558: marked as done (extra-license-file check shouldn't consider .dtd files)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420558: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#231770: marked as done (lintian: Add checks for prompting in maintainerscripts)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#231770: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#420077: marked as done (lintian: Lintian confuses Affero General Public License with GPL)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420077: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#420160: marked as done (please allow to drop version constraint in B-D when it's in stable)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420160: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#420465: marked as done (lintian: no-md5sums-control-file triggered on binary package with no files)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420465: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#378088: marked as done (new control file: clilibs)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378088: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#420526: marked as done (lintian: false positive: clean-should-be-satisfied-by-build-depends python-central)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420526: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#419461: marked as done ([checks/scripts] Add maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-xml-core check)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419461: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#295072: marked as done (Several stderr output running lintian on all packages)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295072: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#305173: marked as done (lintian.debian.org: discern between maintainer not found and no lintian errors)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305173: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#56440: marked as done ([checks/shared-libs] shlibs with incorrect package name)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#56440: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#419847: marked as done ([lintian] Please check for required Index lines in doc-base files)

2007-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419847: fixed in lintian 1.23.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now