Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.34
Severity: normal
Hi,
at the moment I'm working on a package which ships several scripts
written in csh. Adding
c-shell | tcsh
to Deps results in the following warning:
W: radiance: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends
depends: c-shell
which
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.34
Severity: minor
Hi,
running lintian on the xorg-server package from experimental gives me
the following errors:
E: xorg-server source: debian-control-with-duplicate-fields #package:
88, 108
E: xorg-server source: debian-control-with-duplicate-fields
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.34
Severity: normal
Hi,
at the moment I'm working on a package which ships several scripts
written in csh. Adding
c-shell | tcsh
to Deps results in the following warning:
W: radiance:
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.34
Severity: minor
Hi,
running lintian on the xorg-server package from experimental gives me
the following errors:
E: xorg-server source: debian-control-with-duplicate-fields #package:
88, 108
[...]
These come
You have to list the real package first, so that should be:
Depends: tcsh | c-shell
It should be happy then. (This lintian test is of somewhat arguable
utility.)
I've used tcsh | c-shell | csh now, and it throws the same error as with
csh | c-shell | tcsh
E: radiance:
Right, you really can't list csh right now and not get a lintian error,
since as I mentioned, lintian doesn't know it exists.
That dependency line also doesn't really make sense, since both csh and
tcsh provide c-shell. The normal convention with virtual packages is to
list the Debian
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have to list the real package first, so that should be:
Depends: tcsh | c-shell
It should be happy then. (This lintian test is of somewhat arguable
utility.)
I've used tcsh | c-shell | csh now, and it throws the same error as with
csh |
On Tue, Sep 4, 2007 at 09:24:33 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I see no indication in Debian Policy that comments are permitted in
control files. I'm happy to change Policy and then the lintian check if
they truly are, but I'd need confirmation from everything significant that
parses control
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anything other than dpkg-dev need to parse debian/control files (in
source packages)? This is bug#191810 in dpkg-dev, FWIW, so it's
supported since 2003.
debhelper, devtools, etc., and I don't know if dak does as well. But
thinking about it, I'm
9 matches
Mail list logo
