Re: Best medicines with best discounts over the world

The message that you sent to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has not yet been delivered: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Best medicines with best discounts over the world Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:36:29 -0500 I am now using Vanquish to avoid spam. This automated message is an optional feature of that

RE: Don't waste your time. Cheap pills are here

Your message has been received. Our hours of operation are Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 6:30 PM and on Saturday 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM. We will contact you during those hours. Gulf Rent-A-Car, Inc. 529 Howard Ct. Clearwater, FL 33756 (800)575-2855 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Response from Woodring Saint Preux, Fouye Networks and Team

Auto-reply for Inquiry to Fouye Networks / Woodring Saint Preux Thank you for your e-mail inquiry! The below e-mail will direct you to our fastest answers: Are you Haitian? = = = = = = = - For Haitian event or to submit a Haitian event visit: http://www.belfet.com - For Haitian news or to

Automaattinen poissaolovastaus: Enjoy our Winter discounts

Sähköpostiosoitteeni on muuttunut. Uusi osoitteeni on [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Arto Erkinantti WM-data, eFennia Elektroniikkatie 2 B 90570 Oulu Vaihde: 010 302 010 Matkapuhelin: 050 408 8254 Faksinumero: 010 302 7750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.wmdata.fi

Illegal IMail List Server Command!

IMail List Server for Windows NT, Ipswitch, Inc. Valid Commands are: To subscribe to a list, send a mail message to imailsrv at this address with the following in the body of the message: subscribe listname

lintian: r1180 - in trunk: checks debian

Author: rra Date: 2008-02-06 07:12:27 +0100 (Wed, 06 Feb 2008) New Revision: 1180 Modified: trunk/checks/fields trunk/checks/fields.desc trunk/debian/changelog Log: + [RA] Remove the package-has-duplicate-relation test. It gets relations with different version strictness in

Processing of lintian_1.23.43_i386.changes

lintian_1.23.43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_1.23.43.dsc lintian_1.23.43.tar.gz lintian_1.23.43_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

lintian: r1181 - releases

Author: rra Date: 2008-02-06 07:32:43 +0100 (Wed, 06 Feb 2008) New Revision: 1181 Added: releases/1.23.43/ Log: Tag 1.23.43 release. Copied: releases/1.23.43 (from rev 1180, trunk) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#458742: marked as done (lintian: Please test for valid filenames for run-parts)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#458742: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#459787: marked as done (lintian doesn't accept origin and bugs field in binary packages)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#459787: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461822: marked as done (lintian: Please consider correct (Unicode-aware) line length in debian/changelog for line-too-long)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461822: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#462456: marked as done (lintian: Please consider testing if files in -dbg packages retain Dynamic Section entries)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#462456: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463282: marked as done (lintian: tclsh-script-but-no-tclsh-dep and wish-script-but-no-wish-dep don't test for all Tcl/Tk packages)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463281: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#459851: marked as done (lintian: outputs wrong total count of overrides)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#459851: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#460966: marked as done (uninitialized values when having empty prerm script)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#460966: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#460731: marked as done (not-using-po-debconf is overeager)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#460731: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#462601: marked as done (lintian: su-wrapper-not-su-to-root doesn't catch all the desktop files using non su-to-root wrappers)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#462601: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#464026: marked as done ([checks/scripts] Sync bashism tests with checkbashisms)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#464026: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#459871: marked as done (hyphen-used-as-minus-sign false positives)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#459871: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#460625: marked as done (Check for python build-deps doesn't allow packages relying on specific versions)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#460625: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461978: marked as done (lintian: spurious Perl warnings with --unpack)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461978: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461823: marked as done (lintian: Please detect distribution/urgency mismatches)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461823: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463138: marked as done (lintian: package-contains-empty-perl-directory and Perl 5.10)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463138: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#377392: marked as done ([manpages] check for undefined macros)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#377392: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#458164: marked as done (Lintian should not suggest the Makefile test for packages that use a static Makefile)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#458164: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463142: marked as done (lintian: please check for a missing perlapi-* dependency)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463142: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#459509: marked as done (Regression in 'binary-with-bad-dynamic-table' test)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#459509: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#460499: marked as done (lintian: No need to warn about missing short-description LSB header in init.d scripts)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#460499: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#459514: marked as done ('script-with-language-extension' should check for more languages)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#459514: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463281: marked as done (lintian: tclsh-script-but-no-tclsh-dep and wish-script-but-no-wish-dep don't test for all Tcl/Tk packages)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463281: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#462635: marked as done (lintian: Please warn if maintainer is a list and uploaders is empty)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#462635: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#462586: marked as done (lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#462586: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463028: marked as done (lintian should complain about use of dh_* without proper versioned build-dep)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463028: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#460964: marked as done (issues unknown unknown-interpreter tag)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#460964: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461982: marked as done (lintian: breaks when laboratory directory is specified as a relative path)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461982: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461350: marked as done ([shared-libs] Check for a missing libc dependency indicating ${shlibs:Depends} problems)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461350: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463913: marked as done (lintian: Miscounts line length when unicode characters are involved)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461822: fixed in lintian 1.23.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now