Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it

2008-05-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Frank, On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:37:11PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: opening a browser on[1] and then clicking on QA overview the resulting DDPO page is broken; I think a urlencode() is needed. Regards, Sandro

Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it

2008-05-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:37:11PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: opening a browser on[1] and then clicking on QA overview the resulting DDPO page is broken; I think a urlencode() is

lintian: r1309 - in trunk: debian reporting

2008-05-16 Thread djpig
Author: djpig Date: 2008-05-17 00:47:23 +0200 (Sat, 17 May 2008) New Revision: 1309 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/reporting/html_reports Log: * reporting/html_reports: + Escape $email variable for usage in URI query strings. Currently it is not used for anything else, so it

Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it

2008-05-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:37:11PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: opening a browser on[1] and then clicking on

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r1309

2008-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r1309 by djpig tag 481256 + pending Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it

2008-05-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:37:11PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: opening a browser on[1] and then clicking on QA overview the resulting DDPO page is broken; I think a urlencode() is needed. Regards, Sandro [1] http://lintian.debian.org/reports/maintainer/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Should be fixed

lintian: r1310 - in trunk: debian lib

2008-05-16 Thread djpig
Author: djpig Date: 2008-05-17 00:53:04 +0200 (Sat, 17 May 2008) New Revision: 1310 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/lib/Util.pm Log: * lib/Util.pm: + Only require Digest::SHA if the code path is really used. This makes it unnessesary to install libdigest-sha-perl on

Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it

2008-05-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The fix was on lintian side (I suppose): now the url from QA overview really links to http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ben%2Bdebian%40benfinney.id.au Oh, I see, Frank just committed it. I should have checked the timestamps on the messages! --

Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it

2008-05-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've committed the fix now, so you don't need not wonder anymore ;) While at it I switched lintian.debian.org to 1.23.48. Yeah, for some reason I thought the response on the lintian list was to an older message by you that I'd missed, rather than to

Bug#481256: lintian.d.o: wrong link to DDPO for email with '+' in it

2008-05-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:42:50PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:37:11PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: opening a browser on[1] and then clicking on QA

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:00:48AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 20:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:14 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Easiest would probably be to just give Adam commit rights and let