lintian: r1311 - in trunk: debian frontend man

2008-05-19 Thread djpig
Author: djpig Date: 2008-05-20 02:07:17 +0200 (Tue, 20 May 2008) New Revision: 1311 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/frontend/lintian trunk/man/lintian.1 Log: Add a --keep-lab option to make it easier to debug temporary labs. (Closes: #401046) Modified: trunk/debian/changelog

Broken code in checks/binaries

2008-05-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
checks/binaries contains the following piece of code: 127 sub lib_soname_path { 128my (@paths) = @_; 129foreach my $path (@paths) { 130 return 1 if $path =~ m%^(\.?/)?lib/[^/]+$%; 131 return 1 if $path =~ m%^(\.?/)?usr/lib/[^/]+$%; 132 return 1 if $path =~

lintian: r1318 - in trunk: checks debian

2008-05-19 Thread djpig
Author: djpig Date: 2008-05-20 04:08:16 +0200 (Tue, 20 May 2008) New Revision: 1318 Modified: trunk/checks/scripts trunk/debian/changelog Log: * checks/scripts: + Always use /bin/bash for shell script syntax check to give consistent errors on systems with changed /bin/sh. Suggested

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:44:23PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe that code should be moved to Alioth at some point... Until Jeroen shows some sign of life please send patches again. I wouldn't mind migrating Lintian to Git, for that matter,

Re: Broken code in checks/binaries

2008-05-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:45:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Obviously line 133 is never reached because 131 already matches such paths. And return 1 seems to be wrong thing to do for line 133 anyway. What is line 133 supposed to do? return 0

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r1318

2008-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r1318 by djpig tag 478192 + pending Bug#478192: maintainer-shell-script-fails-syntax-check should be more consistent There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping

Re: Broken code in checks/binaries

2008-05-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:45:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: checks/binaries contains the following piece of code: 127 sub lib_soname_path { 128my (@paths) = @_; 129foreach my $path (@paths) { 130 return 1 if $path =~

Created an RT ticket for lintian user

2008-05-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
See https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=679 Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Have you generated an account at http://svn.wolffelaar.nl/ ? I've tried, a few times, but it appears