Bug#471263: Generated changes and patch systems

2008-05-28 Thread Neil Williams
Oops, sent to the wrong bug report. On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:45 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:06 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 08:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Lots of other packages do this -- one of

Re: Hermes

2008-05-28 Thread feedback
You have sent email to a mailbox that is not accessible within the nextgenmg.com domain. Please check the destination address. Due to recent spam attacks we have temporarily shut down [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have left the old URL(s) on the website to deflect those mail sources with invalid

MESSAGE NOT DELIVERED: Re: Is that your document?

2008-05-28 Thread incoming
Your message could not be delivered. The User is out of space. Please try to send your message again at a later time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Automatická odpověď v nepřítomno sti: [6]: ???????? ??? ? ? ???????? ????!

2008-05-28 Thread Cígler Martin
Do 3. června 2008 jsem služebně mimo kancelář s omezeným přístupem k emailu. V naléhavých případech prosím kontaktujte Ivanu Gregovou na adrese [EMAIL PROTECTED] nebo telefonem +420 549 522 571. I am currently out of the office until June 3rd (business trip), with limited access to email. In

Undeliverable mail.

2008-05-28 Thread Altezza Message Transfer Agent
Hi there! Your email address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is being returned because I could not find a mailbox! (#5.1.1) If you feel this is an error please let [EMAIL PROTECTED] know. Altezza Mail Transfer Agent 3.1.0001 (Built August 19, 2003) begin 666 Original.eml MUS96YD97(Z(QI;G1I86XM;6%I;G1

Re: Extended Mail System

2008-05-28 Thread Confirmation from gwyneth hannagan
The message that you sent to me (gwyneth hannagan) has not yet been delivered: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Extended Mail System Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:06:42 + I am now using Vanquish to avoid spam. This automated message is an optional feature of that service, which I have

Bug#483384: lintian: False positive on native-package-with-dash-version with 3.0 (quilt) source packages

2008-05-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.49 Severity: normal If you generate a 3.0 (quilt) source package with $ dpkg-source --format=3.0 (quilt) -b mypackagedir and you analyze with lintian the generated source package you'll end up with something like this: W: quilt source:

Processed: tagging 482795

2008-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28 tags 482795 wontfix Bug#482795: lintian: should not recommend debian/templates.pot to exist in source There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix End of message, stopping

Re: Lintian Maints happy with Subversion?

2008-05-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:46:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since lintian is one of the few remaining pieces of original code (as opposed to non-native packages) that I co-maintain and that is not yet maintained in a distributed VCS I justed

Bug#482869: lintian: no-md5sums-control-file false positive on package containing only conffiles

2008-05-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 12:30:54PM -0400, Zack Weinberg wrote: I have a package that contains only conffiles and directories. (It works with another package that can, among other things, be used as a network server, by providing scripts and a directory hierarchy to make that easy.) [...]

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:32:42AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Have you generated an account at

Bug#482869: lintian: no-md5sums-control-file false positive on package containing only conffiles

2008-05-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russ Allbery wrote: We do already have code that's supposed to check whether an md5sums control file is needed. It apparently isn't working right. (Naively, I would have thought that files in /etc would still have md5sums in the package? I'm probably