Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)

2008-05-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When some maintainer has 'no warning' from lintian run in their package(s), http://lintian.debian.org/reports/maintainer/maintainer-email.html doesn't show 'information' tags of lintian.

Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)

2008-05-29 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Thursday 29 May 2008 7:06:40 pm Frank Lichtenheld wrote: http://lintian.debian.org/reports/full/maintainer-email.html to see things other than warning and error. Yeah, but the empty maintainer page has no link to the full page, which should be changed. Yes. That was my point

lintian: r1324 - trunk/reporting

2008-05-29 Thread djpig
Author: djpig Date: 2008-05-29 17:34:20 +0200 (Thu, 29 May 2008) New Revision: 1324 Modified: trunk/reporting/html_reports Log: Be a little nicer to the emacs syntax highlighter Modified: trunk/reporting/html_reports === ---

lintian: r1325 - in trunk: debian reporting/templates

2008-05-29 Thread djpig
Author: djpig Date: 2008-05-29 17:34:56 +0200 (Thu, 29 May 2008) New Revision: 1325 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/reporting/templates/clean.tmpl Log: * reporting/templates/clean.tmpl: + Include link to full maintainer report. Suggested by Kartik Mistry. Modified:

Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)

2008-05-29 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Thursday 29 May 2008 8:41:00 pm Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Yeah, but the empty maintainer page has no link to the full page, which should be changed. Yes. That was my point actually :) Fixed. Thanks! Cheers, Kartik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 22:35 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:32:42AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Maybe that code should be moved to Alioth at some point... I did notice that there was an Alioth

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks. Yet another reason to move learn at least basic git-fu up the to-do list. It's like someone's trying to tell me something... :) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/git.html might help. It's what I wrote as part of learning it myself. --

lintian: r1326 - in trunk: checks debian testset testset/etcfiles/debian

2008-05-29 Thread djpig
Author: djpig Date: 2008-05-29 23:32:44 +0200 (Thu, 29 May 2008) New Revision: 1326 Modified: trunk/checks/md5sums trunk/debian/changelog trunk/testset/etcfiles/debian/control trunk/testset/etcfiles/debian/rules trunk/testset/tags.etcfiles Log: * checks/md5sums: + Don't complain

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r1326

2008-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r1326 by djpig tag 482869 + pending Bug#482869: lintian: no-md5sums-control-file false positive on package containing only conffiles There were no tags set. Tags added: pending