Christoph Martin wrote:
If a maintainer has some packages with his email address in different
case in the maintainer field they end up on different pages on
qa.debian.org. See for example:
[...]
Ony should get the same page independent of the case of the maintainer
email.
Probably this is
Due to significant amount of SPAM on this account, I have now changed my email
address and this address is not active anymore.
If you are sending a legitimate email, please contact me via my other email
accounts.
Thanks,
Sean
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.24.0~bpo40+1
Severity: normal
If only the case of the email address in the changelog differs from
the case of the email address in the Maintainer field, lintian thinks
falsly it is a NMU with the following warnings:
Jordà Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wrote a more detailed description to use as a reference. There may
still be changes in the future if needed, but I plan to use the
following levels for the first pass. Comments and suggestions are always
welcome.
Looks good to me. I can't think of
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 20:03 +0200, Jordà Polo wrote:
[My comments may appear a little picky in places - because they are ;-)
That's because I don't have any real issues with the content though]
Severity represents how grave is the problem that can be detected using
a particular check.
s/is
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-18 22:36:36 +0200 (Wed, 18 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1392
Modified:
trunk/checks/scripts
Log:
These regexes are not quite identical. Patch by Adam was broken by
my editing.
Modified: trunk/checks/scripts
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-18 23:48:41 +0200 (Wed, 18 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1393
Modified:
trunk/reporting/lintian.css
trunk/reporting/templates/tag.tmpl
Log:
* reporting/templates/tag.tmpl:
+ Mark overridden tags.
Modified: trunk/reporting/lintian.css
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* reporting/templates/tag.tmpl:
+ Mark overridden tags.
Oh, thank you, I was just going to look at doing that!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:48:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-18 23:48:41 +0200 (Wed, 18 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1393
Modified:
trunk/reporting/lintian.css
trunk/reporting/templates/tag.tmpl
Log:
* reporting/templates/tag.tmpl:
+ Mark overridden
Hi,
I was just having a quick look at the new web pages (which are very
cool :-) and spotted what appears to be an off-by-one or similar issue
in the tags report.
Part of the report includes:
derivations (binary)
suggests: tetex-bin
devscripts (binary)
suggests:
FYI: The status of the lintian source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.23.49
Current version: 1.24.1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 23:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
I was just having a quick look at the new web pages (which are very
cool :-) and spotted what appears to be an off-by-one or similar issue
in the tags report.
In case it wasn't obvious and as I forgot to include it in the
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 00:57 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Please include an example URL in future reports, though.
I realised my omission as soon as I'd sent the message :-( I did follow
up with an example but presumably you were fixing it by that time. :)
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:32:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
I was just having a quick look at the new web pages (which are very
cool :-) and spotted what appears to be an off-by-one or similar issue
in the tags report.
Thanks for catching that, caused by my earlier changes today.
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-19 01:35:57 +0200 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1395
Modified:
trunk/checks/scripts
Log:
Yeah, I managed to break the fix. Serves me right for not
running the test suite.
Modified: trunk/checks/scripts
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-19 01:40:36 +0200 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1396
Modified:
trunk/lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm
Log:
* lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm:
+ Add support for file-info file.
Modified: trunk/lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:04:19AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 00:57 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Please include an example URL in future reports, though.
I realised my omission as soon as I'd sent the message :-( I did follow
up with an example but presumably you
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-19 02:13:41 +0200 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1397
Modified:
trunk/reporting/templates/tag.tmpl
Log:
Another bug in previous patch: Don't lose the last package's info.
Modified: trunk/reporting/templates/tag.tmpl
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-19 02:14:58 +0200 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1398
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Forgot to commit changelog entry
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-19 02:16:27 +0200 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1399
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/reporting/html_reports
Log:
* reporting/html_reports:
+ [FL] Mark the tag pages with the correct code.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
Author: djpig
Date: 2008-06-19 02:41:13 +0200 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1400
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/reporting/lintian.css
trunk/reporting/templates/maintainer.tmpl
Log:
* reporting/templates/maintainer.tmpl:
+ Add links to p.d.o and PTS for each source package.
21 matches
Mail list logo
