Bug#539066: lintian: [checks/shared-libs] misleading message for unknown dash-containing version in symbols file

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
submitter 539066 ! retitle 539066 [checks/shared-libs] symbols-file-contains-debian-revision false positives when upstream version contains dash thanks Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: But I have had a change of heart. Although it would be friendlier to handle such versions well,

Processed: Re: Bug#539066: lintian: [checks/shared-libs] misleading message for unknown dash-containing version in symbols file

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: submitter 539066 ! Bug #539066 [lintian] lintian: [checks/shared-libs] misleading message for unknown dash-containing version in symbols file Changed Bug submitter to 'Russ Allbery r...@debian.org' from 'Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com'

Bug#563370: lintian: [checks/control-file] weak-library-dev-dependency false positive

2010-01-02 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: lintian Version: 2.3.0 Severity: normal On a source package with the attached control file, I get: E: pixman source: weak-library-dev-dependency libpixman-1-dev on \n libpixman-1-0 (= ${binary:Version}) which looks like a bug in lintian's debian/control parsing code? Cheers, Julien --

Re: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2010-01-02 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 08:11:58PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: We're also looking for someone who would like to tackle converting the Lintian manual to Docbook instead of DebianDoc-SGML and working on updates. There's quite a bit about Lintian that isn't currently documented. If you're

Re: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2010-01-02 Thread Martin Ågren
Hi lintian maintainers! [I decided not to respect the Reply-To: d-d and instead contact you directly.] 2010/1/2 Russ Allbery r...@debian.org: We're also looking for someone who would like to tackle converting the Lintian manual to Docbook instead of DebianDoc-SGML and working on updates.  

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.3.0-55-gaf42478

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit af42478e50a652f46915710c88e2097d4a07e652 Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org Date: Sat Jan 2 10:27:57 2010 -0800 Fix parsing of Depends for weak-library-dev-dependency * checks/control-file: + [RA] Fix parsing

Bug#563370: lintian: [checks/control-file] weak-library-dev-dependency false positive

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On a source package with the attached control file, I get: E: pixman source: weak-library-dev-dependency libpixman-1-dev on \n libpixman-1-0 (= ${binary:Version}) which looks like a bug in lintian's debian/control parsing code? Indeed, thanks.

Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 563370

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #lintian (2.3.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * checks/control-file: #+ [RA] Fix parsing of dependencies for weak-library-dev-dependency # when the content of Depends begins with a newline. Thanks, Julien # Cristau. (Closes:

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.3.0-57-gdd4f8dd

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 8e4718b43d2842076bba862dee4f394a820b0737 Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org Date: Sat Jan 2 10:52:39 2010 -0800 Add new test for no-human-maintainers, retire cdbs-test Add a new-style test case for

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.3.0-57-gdd4f8dd

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit dd4f8ddb3d1316eddec5d0e9e7467a037cee9881 Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org Date: Sat Jan 2 10:59:38 2010 -0800 Add binary in arch: all package test to new test suite Add a test for

Re: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Wow, two volunteers within a day! That's excellent. I'm replying to this message since it goes into detail on the conversion process and copying Osamu Aoki on this message. I'm not sure how easily the work can be divided up -- maybe both of you can work out between each other how to split

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.3.0-59-g238f686

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 7761d858f8e038c61af1598c1125b135ae20d5e8 Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org Date: Sat Jan 2 20:36:00 2010 -0800 Update legacy test suite for global ${misc:Depends} recommendation diff --git a/testset/tags.fields

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.3.0-59-g238f686

2010-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 238f68664273dde298431b41847cdfdc3bc64cfe Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org Date: Sat Jan 2 21:02:14 2010 -0800 Finalize changes for 2.3.1 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index afab1df..fa6d36f 100755 ---

Processing of lintian_2.3.1_i386.changes

2010-01-02 Thread Archive Administrator
lintian_2.3.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.3.1.dsc lintian_2.3.1.tar.gz lintian_2.3.1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

lintian_2.3.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-01-02 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: lintian_2.3.1.dsc to main/l/lintian/lintian_2.3.1.dsc lintian_2.3.1.tar.gz to main/l/lintian/lintian_2.3.1.tar.gz lintian_2.3.1_all.deb to main/l/lintian/lintian_2.3.1_all.deb Override entries for your package: lintian_2.3.1.dsc - source devel lintian_2.3.1_all.deb - optional

Bug#550594: marked as done (warn about invalid versions in debian/NEWS.Debian)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002lb...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#550594: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #550594, regarding warn about invalid versions in debian/NEWS.Debian to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#553264: marked as done (lintian: diff-contains-cmake-cache-file false positive)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002le...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#553264: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #553264, regarding lintian: diff-contains-cmake-cache-file false positive to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#563370: marked as done (lintian: [checks/control-file] weak-library-dev-dependency false positive)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002lr...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#563370: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #563370, regarding lintian: [checks/control-file] weak-library-dev-dependency false positive to be marked as

Bug#563185: marked as done (lintian: typo (suble - subtle))

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002lo...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#563185: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #563185, regarding lintian: typo (suble - subtle) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#559208: marked as done (new error: package-installs-file-to-etc-udev)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002lk...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#559208: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #559208, regarding new error: package-installs-file-to-etc-udev to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#562875: marked as done (Misreports patches as modifying Debian files)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002lt...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#562875: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #562875, regarding Misreports patches as modifying Debian files to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#563126: marked as done ([reporting/] code used to group together tags fails in some cases)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002lj...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#563126: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #563126, regarding [reporting/] code used to group together tags fails in some cases to be marked as done. This

Bug#562608: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop not for just 1.)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002ln...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#562608: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #562608, regarding lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop not for just 1. to be marked as done. This

Bug#563039: marked as done (Too high severity of spelling-error-in-manpage?)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002le...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#563039: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #563039, regarding Too high severity of spelling-error-in-manpage? to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#562788: marked as done (lintian complains about hppa64 binaries on hppa)

2010-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id e1nripx-0002lq...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#562788: fixed in lintian 2.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #562788, regarding lintian complains about hppa64 binaries on hppa to be marked as done. This means that you