* Russ Allbery r...@debian.org [2010-02-08 23:58:30 CET]:
Gerfried Fuchs rho...@debian.at writes:
In a maintainerscript that starts off with #!/bin/sh -e an additional
set -e doesn't make much sense - though it seems like lintian insists
on this style. It would be pretty convenient if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 560414 patch
Bug #560414 [lintian] lintian: Don't warn about length of short description of
text templates
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Gerfried Fuchs rho...@deb.at writes:
Ah, now I see the difference. Though, I'd like to challenge the
explenation:
This is fine for normal operation, but if the script is run by
hand with sh /path/to/script (common in debugging), -e
will not be in effect. It's therefore better to use
Your message dated Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:28:24 +0100
with message-id 20100209212824.ga29...@anguilla.debian.or.at
and subject line Re: Bug#568926: lintian seems to insist on set -e and doesn't
like #!/bin/sh -e
has caused the Debian Bug report #568926,
regarding lintian seems to insist on set -e and
tag 560414 patch
thanks
Attached a patch that implements this. It changes the name of the local
variable (template) 'type' which currently shadows the higher level
(package) 'type' variable.
Cheers,
FJP
--- checks/debconf.orig 2010-01-31 10:02:32.0 +0100
+++ checks/debconf 2010-02-09
5 matches
Mail list logo