Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.4
Severity: normal
I think lintian is wrong in testing encoding issue for manapage. I have
installed hello-debhelper (2.5-1). then I downloaded its binary package
hello-debhelper_2.5-1_amd64.deb and extracted to hello.1 into a working
directry.
In short, instead
clone 567485 -1
reassign -1 debian-policy
retitle -1 Clarify that Changed-By must have name and email address
severity -1 wishlist
tags -1 =
thanks
On 20/03/2010 23:51, Russ Allbery wrote:
> tags 567485 wontfix
> thanks
>
> Jean-Christophe Dubacq writes:
>
>> Though the check is correct, it shou
Media Naranja: Alguien te está esperando...
¡Ven y únete el Media Naranja!
Hector Valle
Haz clic en el vínculo siguiente para participar:
http://tunaranja.ning.com/?xgi=12K8sG7JOBT69Y&xg_source=msg_invite_net
If your email program doesn't recognize the web address above as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 567485 -1
Bug#567485: [checks/lintian] changed-by-name-missing is not Severity: serious
Bug 567485 cloned as bug 575639.
> reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug #575639 [lintian] [checks/lintian] changed-by-name-missing is not Severity:
serious
Bu
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
lintian fails to open an .orig.tar.xz tarball, probably lack of support
for the new compression scheme:
internal error: could not find the source tarball
warning: could not unpack package to desired level
Andreas
Just playing around
I see I accidentally failed to send this to the bug report
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#575447: lintian: Please add a warning in a .jar is not
in /usr/share/java/
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:49:05 +0100
From: Niels Thykier
To: Sylvestre Ledru
References: <4babcb51.9080...@t
Russ Allbery writes:
> Arto Jantunen writes:
>
>> Python-support generates python (>= 2.6) | python2.6 for this case
>> (which is partially broken since the scripts get /usr/bin/python2.6
>> which wouldn't be provided by 2.7 etc), maybe that is different from
>> just depending on 2.6?
>
> Ah, ye
Arto Jantunen writes:
> For bcfg2 that is the case, but bcfg2-server gets the conditional
> depends and lintian warns. Interresting that those are different,
> btw.
Doh. I'm remarkably blind this morning.
> Hmm. I need to figure out why the two packages from the same source
> get different re
Arto Jantunen writes:
> Python-support generates python (>= 2.6) | python2.6 for this case
> (which is partially broken since the scripts get /usr/bin/python2.6
> which wouldn't be provided by 2.7 etc), maybe that is different from
> just depending on 2.6?
Ah, yes. Lintian would correctly diagn
Russ Allbery writes:
> Michael Meskes writes:
>> Besides these errors seem to be wrong as all the libraries lintian moans
>> about are in a private directory. Or what am I missing?
> Lintian doesn't know that /usr/lib/virtualbox is a valid private directory
> for a package named virtualbox-ose.
Russ Allbery writes:
> Arto Jantunen writes:
>> That package isn't yet in the archive, but as I see it any
>> python-support using package should do for a test case. Just set
>> debian/pyversions to 2.6-, build-dep on python2.6, Depend on
>> ${python:Depends} and this happens.
>
> I can't duplic
Michael Meskes writes:
> could you tell me which options you use when running lintian on
> virtualbox-ose? I cannot get lintian to spit put all these
> binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath errors when running it locally.
Lintian isn't run with any special flags on lintian.d.o other than the
flags to s
Hi,
could you tell me which options you use when running lintian on virtualbox-ose?
I cannot get lintian to spit put all these binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath errors
when running it locally. Besides these errors seem to be wrong as all the
libraries lintian moans about are in a private directory. Or
Arto Jantunen writes:
> I'm positive:
> vi...@tsunami:~/debian/work$ lintian --version
> Lintian v2.3.4
> vi...@tsunami:~/debian/work$ lintian bcfg2_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes
> W: bcfg2-server: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/bcfg2-ping-sweep
> W: bcfg2-server: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/bcfg2
Russ Allbery writes:
> Arto Jantunen writes:
>
>> Package: lintian
>> Version: 2.3.4
>> Severity: normal
>
>> False positives as described in the subject. Possibly 2.6 is missing
>> from the regexp used by this check?
>
> Are you positive you're using 2.3.4? I added 2.6 in that version.
I'm po
Arto Jantunen writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.3.4
> Severity: normal
> False positives as described in the subject. Possibly 2.6 is missing
> from the regexp used by this check?
Are you positive you're using 2.3.4? I added 2.6 in that version.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.4
Severity: normal
False positives as described in the subject. Possibly 2.6 is missing from the
regexp used by this check?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture:
17 matches
Mail list logo
