Accepted:
lintian_2.4.2.dsc
to main/l/lintian/lintian_2.4.2.dsc
lintian_2.4.2.tar.gz
to main/l/lintian/lintian_2.4.2.tar.gz
lintian_2.4.2_all.deb
to main/l/lintian/lintian_2.4.2_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
lintian_2.4.2.dsc - source devel
lintian_2.4.2_all.deb - optional
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-000347...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#586984: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #586984,
regarding lintian: wrong diversion-for-unknown-file */usr/lib/libGL.so
preinst:34
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00034a...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#587209: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #587209,
regarding lintian: conflicting checks for dash
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00033h...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#582741: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #582741,
regarding lintian: [checks/nmu] Team uploads.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org writes:
On Monday 28 Jun 2010 06:14:59 Russ Allbery wrote:
Is your plan to change that file to ues the full path to the
interpreter so that it would become a valid executable?
There are around 50+ example files shipped like that from
upstream. Currently, I
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:09 +
with message-id e1ot6wz-00033a...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#575661: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #575661,
regarding [checks/manpages] manpage-has-errors for multibyte issue on col must
be skipped
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00033b...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#582353: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #582353,
regarding lintian: Please add spelling check for typo 'oAuth'
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00033q...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#583555: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #583555,
regarding lintian - Undefined subroutine Lintian::Schedule::warning
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:09 +
with message-id e1ot6wz-00033f...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#580082: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #580082,
regarding lintian erroneously suggests to change lsb dependency from checkroot
to virtual facility
On Monday 28 Jun 2010 06:14:59 Russ Allbery wrote:
Is your plan to change that
file to ues the full path to the interpreter so that it would become a
valid executable?
There are around 50+ example files shipped like that from upstream. Currently,
I don't plan to carry a patch patching all
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-000342...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#586877: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #586877,
regarding lintian: don't check haskell library packages for doc-base
registration
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00033k...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#580494: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #580494,
regarding lintian: stronger-dependency-implies-weaker false positives on
package names containing
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00033v...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#584743: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #584743,
regarding Add powerpcspe to architecture list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00033p...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#580700: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #580700,
regarding lintian: Typo in duplicated-key-in-desktop-entry description
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:32:10 +
with message-id e1ot6x0-00033w...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#581314: fixed in lintian 2.4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #581314,
regarding lintian: please add new Debian arch: powerpcspe
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#586984: lintian: wrong diversion-for-unknown-file */usr/lib/libGL.so
preinst:34
The wrong file name is gone, but now diversion-for-unknown-file does not
trigger at all.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#580494: lintian: stronger-dependency-implies-weaker false positives on
package names containing substvars
I'm still getting the same stronger-dependency-implies-weaker as before.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
17 matches
Mail list logo
